House Speaker Nancy Pelosi; deficit reduction suggestions; and new warning labels for cigarettes.
Speaking of Pelosi
Re “Speaker or not, she’s a keeper,” Editorial, Nov. 11
Thank you for your timely defense of Nancy Pelosi’s performance as speaker of the House. As you aptly mentioned, her job is to pass legislation, not to win popularity awards. Part of the reason Democrats often fail, even with sizable majorities, is they forget this fact.
Whether or not you agree with healthcare reform or tighter controls on Wall Street, passing these historic bills despite a solidly entrenched GOP was a huge accomplishment.
President Obama needs to do a better job explaining his policies. Our difficult economic climate had a predictable effect in the midterm elections. But unless he hones his message, the changes so dearly won by Pelosi and others might be at risk in 2012.
Nora Hazi
Pacific Palisades
“Pelosi deserves to stay on as her party’s leader.”
Really? Do we want a leader instrumental in lawmaking who said about the healthcare bill, “We have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it”? I think not.
Eugene Strull
Los Angeles
Pelosi has been effective as a legislative leader. She has been loyal to the ideals of the Democratic Party to improve the lives of middle-class Americans.
Do women, minorities, the jobless, the uninsured and young people who are in school or starting families really think they’re going to get a better deal from John Boehner?
Alba Farfaglia
San Clemente
The politics of deficit-cutting
Re “U.S. panel weighs deep budget cuts,” Nov. 11
The hasty release of information by the chairmen of the president’s deficit reduction commission was either a stroke of genius by the right or political suicide by the Obama administration.
The White House is now in the unenviable position of having been the one to articulate the need for drastic economic measures that appear to benefit the wealthy, letting conservatives off the hook. The right knows that if it had to propose decreasing benefits to Social Security recipients and to begin eviscerating Medicare, to name a few of the suggestions by the commission’s co-chairs, it would galvanize the electorate against any GOP candidate in 2012.
Anthony Balderrama
Eagle Rock
In its proposal to wipe out trillions in projected national deficits, the commission takes aim at the usual suspects: the poor and what’s left of the middle class.
Why not start slashing from the top instead of the bottom? Stupid question, I know.
Too bad average citizens can’t organize like the big corporations do. Just imagine what a better world there would be if the huddled masses had an army of lobbyists.
Mark O’Connell
Irvine
Re “Facing reality on budgets,” Editorial, Nov. 12
You say: “The federal government can print money and borrow from China so it doesn’t have to balance its budget. Unfortunately for California’s Legislature, the state doesn’t have that luxury.”
Change “unfortunately” to “fortunately.”
Why would it be a good thing for California’s Legislature to have unlimited spending power? Look at what it has done to the budget when supposedly balancing it.
Robert B. Kelly
Indio
Not buying big banks
Re “Banks should respect our troops,” Business, Nov. 12
Of course, with bad publicity, Bank of America magnanimously agreed to remove the delinquent payments. Brian Roach should feel honored. But the problem goes way beyond the banks.
The credit bureaus’ rating system needs to be revamped. I have seen credit scores drop 100 points because of an
$8 collection account from a doctor bill that should have been paid by the insurer.
This is just another way for lenders to charge higher interest rates on credit cards, car loans and mortgages.
Chuck Rinaldi
Huntington Beach
This is one more reason that I no longer do business with such a large institution. I only deal with locally owned community banks.
Bruce Savage
Palm Desert
Too scared to smoke?
Re “Cigarettes to carry grim warnings,” Nov. 11
The Food and Drug Administration’s new cigarette packaging proves that government officials believe Americans are stupid. Though there may be a sliver of people who don’t believe smoking has negative health effects, no label exists that is going to change some people’s decision to smoke.
Every day there are people who know full well the dangers of their actions, and yet they still partake in them.
We already have seen government’s increasing support of the nanny state. From banning Happy Meals in San Francisco to taxing Snickers bars in Illinois, there appears to be no end to what steps governments will take to control our decisions.
John Nothdurft
Chicago
The writer is the budget and tax legislative specialist for the Heartland Institute.
I have never smoked. I totally dislike the smell and am very concerned about the serious health dangers of smoking.
But the idea of putting ghastly pictures on cigarette packaging is wrongheaded. Will we be putting pictures of what can happen to people’s livers (and lives) on alcoholic beverage labels? What about bloody scenes of automobile wrecks on ignition key fobs? Where would you make the cutoff?
Again, I honestly dislike smoking. But this silly proposal makes me very uncomfortable.
Doug Stokes
Duarte
Challenged by spelling
Re “Senate race could hinge on legalities,” Nov. 12
I find it more than ironic that Alaska’s GOP Senate hopeful, Joe Miller, would petition a federal court to disenfranchise voters who can’t spell the name of his opponent, Lisa Murkowski, perfectly.
His efforts are just another example of the untold numbers of “tea partyers” accessing Medicare, farm subsidies and Interstate 5 while decrying the intrusion of big government.
Bob Marquardt
Morro Bay, Calif.
So Miller is challenging all misspellings of Murkowski’s name on write-in ballots.
Does this mean that if your name is Smith, you may have a chance to win in a write-in contest, but if your name is Zbniewski, you may as well not even try?
Robin Levin
Woodland Hills
Bicycle safety
Re “Driver gets 90-day term for hit-and-run of cyclist,” Nov. 11
Aurisha Smolarski of the Los Angeles County Bicycle Coalition says, “Cyclists need to be considered viable users of the road, and drivers need to ensure the safety of everyone on the road.”
I invite Smolarski to stand on any street corner in my Los Feliz neighborhood and watch as cyclists sail through signals and stop signs, almost getting themselves hit and giving motorists heart attacks as they have to hit their brakes.
There must be respect and consideration on both sides.
Liz Galloway
Los Angeles
Uh oh, inflation
Re “Rumblings of inflation grow louder,” Nov. 10
So now inflation is predicted shortly after our government decided Social Security should not be increased because inflation is not a threat.
Kurt Sipolski
Palm Desert
More to Read
Get the L.A. Times Politics newsletter
Deeply reported insights into legislation, politics and policy from Sacramento, Washington and beyond. In your inbox three times per week.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.