Students who attended for-profit colleges filed more than 98% of the requests for student loan forgiveness alleging fraud by their schools, according to an analysis of Education Department data published Thursday.
The study by the Century Foundation represents the most thorough analysis to date of the nearly 100,000 loan forgiveness claims known as borrower defense received by the agency over the last two decades and paints an alarming picture of the state of for-profit higher education in America.
The report comes as Education Secretary Betsy DeVos faces criticism for halting two Obama-era regulations that would have added protections for students. Review of tens of thousands of claims has stalled, and the department is considering abandoning the practice of full loan cancellation in favor of partial forgiveness. Student advocates point to the Trump administration’s ties to the for-profit industry and accuse DeVos of putting industry over students.
The study found “a disproportionate concentration of predatory behavior among for-profit colleges” that raises “serious concerns about the federal government’s current approach to providing relief to students who have been defrauded and misled.”
The Education Department said it needs to review the report before commenting.
Of the more than 98,800 complaints received by the department as of mid-August, 98.6% came from students at for-profit schools, while only 1.4% were filed by those who attended nonprofit institutions. For-profit schools account for only 10% of national enrollment and 18% of federal student debt, according to government data.
More than 75,000, or 76%, of claims came from students who attended the now-shuttered Corinthian schools, followed by more than 7,300 students from the ITT Technical Institute chain, as well as students from American Career Institute, the Education Management Corp. and others. The Century Foundation received the data through a Freedom of Information Act request.
“The for-profit college industry scams students across the country and taxpayers, and that’s why the industry — including industry insiders who are now staffing the Department of Education — is now fighting so hard against rules that would clarify the borrower defense process,” said Toby Merrill, director of the Project on Predatory Student Lending at Harvard University, a legal services clinic that represents defrauded students. “If for-profit schools don’t want to be responsible for borrower defense claims and reimbursing taxpayers, then they could simply not cheat their students.”
Steve Gunderson, president of Career Education Colleges and Universities, the industry lobbying group, dismissed the report, calling it an attack on the industry. He suggested that the Obama administration was to blame for the influx of borrower-defense claims from for-profit college students.
“It doesn’t surprise me that the Century Foundation issued a report suggesting for-profit colleges are to blame for borrower defense claims. Look no further than the Obama administration’s destruction of ITT Tech and Corinthian,” Gunderson said in a statement. “This report confirms what we’ve long known: There are dozens of groups coordinating their efforts to destroy our sector.”
For-profit colleges expanded dramatically over the last two decades, with enrollment rising from around 230,000 in the early 1990s to a record 2 million in 2010. They recruited aggressively, targeting non-traditional students — usually older people who had jobs and could study only part-time. They also focused heavily on women, people of color and veterans. But after graduating, many students struggled to find jobs that were promised to them or to transfer credits to other schools, leading to massive student loan defaults. A 2010 government study found that all 15 of the for-profit colleges evaluated by undercover agents made deceptive statements to prospective students and that four of them encouraged fraudulent practices.
The Obama administration cracked down hard on for-profit colleges, pressuring Corinthian and ITT to close and approved at least $655 million in loan cancellations from those chains in recent years. The administration also passed revisions to the borrower defense regulation and to a similar rule, known as gainful employment, with the aim of increasing students’ protections.
DeVos moved to freeze those revisions before they went into effect. There’s now a backlog of 87,000 complaints that haven’t been ruled on, according to the TCF report. DeVos said that she intends to fight fraud but that she believes the Obama revisions were written too broadly and could allow for unsubstantiated claims.
In an interview with Politico published last week, DeVos suggested there was no substantial difference between for-profit and nonprofit schools. “For-profit or not-for-profit is simply a matter of tax status — fraud anywhere needs to be rooted out,” she told the publication.
But Tariq Habash, one of the authors of the Century report, said the study offers evidence to the contrary.
“This highlights a clear difference between for-profits and nonprofits. It’s not just the tax statuses. It’s the control structure that governs these entities,” Habash said.
For-profits, he said, “are financially motivated to maximize their profits, they have conflicting interests, and one will always win over the other.”