YouTube tightens restrictions on firearms videos; one gun channel moves to a porn site
YouTube, a popular media site for firearms enthusiasts, quietly introduced tighter restrictions this week on videos involving weapons, joining the battleground in the U.S. gun-control debate.
YouTube will ban videos that promote or link to websites selling firearms and accessories, including bump stocks, which enable semiautomatic rifles to fire faster. Additionally, YouTube said it will prohibit videos with instructions on how to assemble firearms. The video site, owned by Alphabet Inc.’s Google, has faced intense criticism for hosting videos about guns, bombs and other deadly weapons.
For many gun-rights supporters, YouTube has been a haven. A search on the site for “how to build a gun” yielded more than 25 million results on Thursday, though that included toys. On Tuesday, YouTube suspended the page of at least one producer of gun videos. Another channel opted to move its videos to an adult-content site, saying that would offer more freedom than YouTube.
“We routinely make updates and adjustments to our enforcement guidelines across all of our policies,” a YouTube spokeswoman said in a statement. “While we’ve long prohibited the sale of firearms, we recently notified creators of updates we will be making around content promoting the sale or manufacture of firearms and their accessories.”
YouTube has placed greater restrictions on content several times in the last year, responding to a series of issues with inappropriate and offensive videos. Most of those changes involved pulling ads from categories of videos. Google is more reluctant to remove entire videos from YouTube, but has been willing to pull terrorism-related content.
The National Shooting Sports Foundation, a gun industry lobbying group, called YouTube’s new policy “worrisome.”
“We suspect it will be interpreted to block much more content than the stated goal of firearms and certain accessory sales,” the foundation said in a statement. “We see the real potential for the blocking of educational content that serves instructional, skill-building and even safety purposes. Much like Facebook, YouTube now acts as a virtual public square. The exercise of what amounts to censorship, then, can legitimately be viewed as the stifling of commercial free speech.”
The firearms decision came days before this Saturday’s March for Our Lives, a rally organized by survivors of the Feb. 14 school shooting in Parkland, Fla., that left 17 dead.
The new YouTube policies will be enforced starting in April, but at least two video bloggers have already been affected. Spike’s Tactical, a firearms company, said on Facebook that it was suspended from YouTube due to “repeated or severe violations” of the video platform’s guidelines.
“Well, since we’ve melted some snowflakes on YouTube and got banned, might as well set IG and FB on fire!,” Spike’s wrote on Facebook — where it has more than 111,000 followers — referring to the Instagram app and Facebook’s social network. A YouTube spokeswoman said the channel was mistakenly removed and has been reinstated.
InRange TV, another channel devoted to firearms, wrote on its Facebook page that it would begin uploading videos to PornHub, an adult content website.
YouTube’s “vague and one-sided firearms policy makes it abundantly clear that YouTube cannot be counted upon to be a safe harbor for a wide variety of views and subject matter,” InRange TV wrote. “PornHub has a history of being a proactive voice in the online community, as well as operating a resilient and robust video streaming platform.”
PornHub didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment on the matter.
Last month, gun-control activists escalated the pressure on tech giants for giving a platform to the National Rifle Assn. A flurry of businesses cut ties with the pro-gun group after the deadly Parkland school shooting. Companies with streaming services, such as Amazon.com Inc., Apple Inc. and YouTube, declined to remove the NRA channel.
UPDATES:
11:50 a.m.: This article was updated throughout with reporting from Bloomberg.
This article was originally published at 4:45 a.m.
