Advertisement
Business

Former Juul exec alleges the company shipped tainted vape pods

A woman exhales a puff of vapor from a Juul pen
A woman exhales a puff of vapor from a Juul pen in April.
(Craig Mitchelldyer / Associated Press)

A Juul Labs executive who was fired this year is alleging that the vaping company knowingly shipped 1 million tainted nicotine pods to customers.

The allegation comes in a lawsuit filed Tuesday by lawyers representing Siddharth Breja, a former finance executive at the e-cigarette giant. The suit claims that Breja was terminated after opposing company practices such as shipping contaminated flavored pods and not listing expiration dates on Juul products.

The lawsuit does not specify the contamination issue or how it occurred. Lawyers for Breja declined to elaborate on the issue Wednesday.

A Juul spokesman said in a statement that the claims are “baseless” and that Breja was terminated because he failed to ”demonstrate the leadership qualities” required for the job.

Advertisement

Juul, the top-selling e-cigarette brand in the United States, has been besieged by criticism amid an explosion of underage vaping. The company faces multiple investigations by federal and state officials as well as lawsuits by families of teenagers who say they became hooked on nicotine through the company’s vapes.

Breja worked in Juul’s global finance department less than 10 months. The lawsuit, filed in the Northern District of California, seeks damages for lost salary, bonuses and Juul stock, which it values at more than $10 million.

BuzzFeed News first reported the lawsuit.

Breja describes a “reckless” and ”win-at-all costs” culture at Juul, primarily driven by the company’s former chief executive, Kevin Burns, who was replaced in a management shake-up in September.

Advertisement

Breja says he learned in March that some batches of nicotine solution used in the company’s mint-flavored pods had been contaminated. Breja claims that company management shipped roughly 1 million pods affected by the issue and failed to issue a recall or public announcement.

Juul’s spokesman rejected Breja’s account, saying the company “determined the product met all applicable specifications.”

When Breja protested the decision to ship the pods, the lawsuit alleges, his supervisor at Juul reminded him that ”stockholders would lose significant personal wealth should he make his concerns public.”

The lawsuit alleges that Burns “berated employees” to ramp up production of mint-flavored pods, a move that ”compromised quality control measures.” The focus on mint came after the company, under pressure from health authorities, voluntarily stopped selling its fruit- and candy-flavored pods to third-party retail stores.

The lawsuit alleges that Juul’s outside consultants assured the company that mint, “given its fruity flavor, would make up for any lack of sales of other flavored pods.”

”You need to have an IQ of 5 to know that when customers don’t find mango they buy mint,” Burns told employees, according to the lawsuit.

Breja claims he was wrongfully terminated the week after raising his concerns about contaminated mint pods. Because he had worked at the company for less than a year, he did not receive company stock that his lawyers claim would be worth “eight figures at its current valuation.”

In an earlier conflict with Juul management, Breja says, he urged executives to add expiration or ”best by” dates to the flavored pods.

Advertisement

The lawsuit claims Burns rejected the idea, stating: “Half our customers are drunk and vaping like mo-fo’s, who … is going to notice the quality of our pods.”

Juul’s website states that its pods are intended for use ”soon after purchase.”

Last month Burns was replaced by K.C. Crosthwaite, a former executive for Altria Group Inc., the Marlboro cigarette maker that owns a 35% stake in privately held Juul.

In the last two years, the San Francisco company has become the principal target of a nationwide backlash against e-cigarettes, with parents, politicians and health advocates blaming the firm for the vaping craze among young people.

According to the latest government survey, more than 1 in 4 high school students reported using e-cigarettes in the previous month, despite federal law banning sales to those under 18.

In a separate health issue, federal officials are investigating more than 1,600 cases of lung damage linked to vaping, including nearly three dozen deaths. Many patients said they vaped THC, marijuana’s intoxicating chemical, but officials have not yet implicated any single product or ingredient.

Juul has made a series of voluntary concessions in an effort to weather the firestorm. It’s halted advertising and suspended sales of its fruit and dessert flavored pods. The company continues to sell mint, menthol and tobacco flavors.

The Trump administration announced plans last month to remove virtually all vaping flavors from the market, leaving only tobacco.

Advertisement

But public health advocates are concerned the administration could back away from its plan to ban mint and menthol, the most popular flavors among young people.

Last month more than 50 health groups, including the American Lung Assn. and the American Academy of Pediatrics, sent a letter to First Lady Melania Trump urging the administration to follow through on its initial proposal.

“If the goal is to remove the e-cigarettes that are most attractive to youth, any proposal that ignores mint and menthol flavors falls short,” the groups said.


Newsletter
Get our weekly Business newsletter

A look back, and ahead, at the latest California business news.

You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
Advertisement