‘I got this wrong.’ CEO apologies abound amid mass layoffs and losses. Are they sincere?
While Elon Musk dominates headlines with his abrupt dismissal of half of Twitter’s workforce, other chief executive officers are taking a different approach — blaming themselves for misreading the market and apologizing for having to let people go.
In cutting more than 11,000 jobs last week, Meta Platforms Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg took the empathy management approach, emphasizing his poor decisions and providing support to affected workers.
“I want to take accountability for these decisions and for how we got here,” Zuckerberg said in a letter to employees Wednesday, which was posted on the Facebook parent’s website. “I know this is tough for everyone, and I’m especially sorry to those impacted.”
Sam Bankman-Fried, who resigned Friday as CEO of now-bankrupt crypto exchange FTX, apologized for the exchange’s mismanagement and liquidity crisis in a series of tweets Thursday.
“At the end of the day, I was CEO, which means that I was responsible for making sure that things went well,” he said. “I, ultimately, should have been on top of everything. I clearly failed in that. I’m sorry.”
Amid Twitter layoffs and uncertainty about toxic content, privacy and security, some users are concerned and looking for alternatives.
The mea culpas are the latest in a series that began as the market for tech and e-commerce stocks began to tank over the summer.
In July, Shopify CEO Tobi Lutke fell on his sword in a letter to employees in which he said he wrongly assumed pandemic-era online shopping frothiness would continue.
“It’s now clear that bet didn’t pay off,” he said in explaining the 1,000 job cuts at the retail software provider. “What we see now is the mix reverting to roughly where pre-COVID data would have suggested it should be at this point. Still growing steadily, but it wasn’t a meaningful five-year leap ahead. Ultimately, placing this bet was my call to make, and I got this wrong.”
A month later, Niraj Shah, the CEO and co-founder of Wayfair Inc., also acknowledged that he flubbed the pandemic’s signals. Wayfair’s sales surged in the first year after COVID-19 hit the U.S., then declined for five straight quarters.
“We were seeing the tailwinds of the pandemic accelerate the adoption of e-commerce shopping, and I personally pushed hard to hire a strong team to support that growth,” Shah wrote in a letter to employees in August that announced about 900 job cuts. “This year, that growth has not materialized as we had anticipated. Our team is too large for the environment we are now in, and unfortunately we need to adjust.”
Elon Musk has mistaken his Tesla and SpaceX companies’ success as testaments to his brilliance. Is that why is he taking such dumb steps with Twitter?
And let’s not forget Braden Wallake, the “crying CEO” of HyperSocial, a marketing company in Columbus, Ohio. In August, Wallake wrote a guilt-ridden LinkedIn post about having to lay off two of 17 employees, concluding with a teary-eyed selfie. After the post went viral, he declared himself “the crying CEO.”
These missives stand in contrast to Musk’s approach, which recalls that of longtime General Electric Co. CEO Jack Welch, who infamously made regular — and ruthless — layoffs a management tool.
Welch, however, operated in a very different environment from that of today. Employee expectations have risen significantly.
“The willingness of employees to speak out when they feel that they’re treated unfairly has increased from a sort of, ‘keep your head down, do your work, do what you’re told,’” said Jeffrey Siminoff, who managed Morgan Stanley’s layoffs during the financial crisis and is senior vice president of workplace dignity at the nonprofit group Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights.
“I think executive teams and CEOs understand that very poorly executed processes that are done in very inhumane ways will create a lot of negative backlash that cannot be contained within the four walls of the organization,” Siminoff said.
Disney+ is growing, but Disney’s streaming business is losing billions of dollars a year. Cost cuts were signaled during this week’s earnings announcement.
The biggest difference, though, is that Welch downsized while the labor market was weak, which meant he didn’t have to worry as much about GE’s brand as an employer, said Peter Cappelli, director of the Center for Human Resources at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.
The labor market today, by contrast, is extremely tight, with about 1.9 available jobs for every unemployed person.
“It’s a good question to ask how much of the contemporary scene is playing to the current labor market because they don’t want to damage their employer brand too much,” Cappelli said.
In other words, it might not all be a new age of enlightened management, but a heavy dose of self-interest: Some of the visibly empathetic CEOs know they’ll probably need to hire back some people they laid off and could be positioning themselves to recruit when the recovery comes.