A look at secret negotiations in Mel Gibson case as detectives wrap investigation
Mel Gibsonâs entertainment attorney was summoned to a meeting 11 months ago in Century City and presented with two troubling pieces of information: The movie starâs estranged girlfriend had secretly recorded him in a series of vulgar, racist rants, and she wanted $20 million.
Attorneys for the woman, Oksana Grigorieva, a Russian musician and the mother of Gibsonâs daughter, played excerpts of the recordings. Notes made by the actorâs attorney suggested her lawyers wanted to resolve the coupleâs differences confidentially and keep the tapes private: âNever should become public. Devastating to everyone â including baby.â
Whether that encounter was part of an extortion plot or just hardball legal negotiation is a question for Los Angeles County prosecutors, according to Sheriffâs Department spokesman Steve Whitmore. Detectives handed their findings to the district attorneyâs office Wednesday, he said. Prosecutors will evaluate that evidence at the same time that they weigh domestic violence allegations against Gibson.
Materials reviewed by the Los Angeles Times, including e-mails, text messages, attorneysâ notes and legal papers, provide a rare in-depth look at secret negotiations in a case that has obsessed the tabloids, prompted a six-month sheriffâs investigation and taken up countless hours of court time. The unraveling of these high-stakes backroom talks led to one of Hollywoodâs ugliest splits and, with the leak of the tapes online, the derailing of Gibsonâs attempt at a comeback following a 2006 drunk driving arrest during which he spewed anti-Semitic insults.
The documents describe a period in which the former lovers discussed reconciliation even as their lawyers sparred over the details of a settlement that would include destruction of the tapes.
âYou donât call. You donât accept my invitation to come. You hand tapes around & jeopardize us all,â Gibson texted the same day his lawyers proposed a deal they valued at $18 million.
She replied that Gibson had promised to care for her and their daughter âin the most generous way.â
âI wouldnât have played ur messages if u were keeping ur word,â she wrote.
Last May, they reached a $16-million agreement. Grigorieva subsequently repudiated it, saying she had signed under duress. The case is now in family court, where the judge has urged the sides not to speak publicly after months of leaks from the sealed case to gossip sites. Attorneys contacted by The Times declined to comment or did not return calls.
Grigorieva and Gibson began dating three years ago while he was still married to his wife, Robyn, who filed for divorce after Grigorievaâs pregnancy become public. The singer already had a child with actor Timothy Dalton.
Last February, Grigorieva sought a lawyer after Gibson told her she needed representation because he was preparing to add the baby, Lucia, to his estate plan, according to two people familiar with the situation. The singer was not entitled to any of the actorâs fortune under the terms of a 2009 cohabitation agreement that said she would get only a yearâs free rent in a Sherman Oaks home Gibson owned and a Dodge Charger if they split.
The tapes and pictures she brought to her attorney, Eric George, suggested that Luciaâs trust fund was not the only issue. Grigorieva had photos of broken teeth from a January incident in which she said Gibson punched her twice and brandished a gun. The now-infamous tapes captured Gibsonâs anger and bigotry and a potential admission to assault when he told her, âYou deserved it.â
George was no stranger to high-profile matters. The son of the stateâs former chief justice, George had represented Michael Jacksonâs ex-wife in custody negotiations. He told Grigorieva that he was prepared to draw up a lawsuit against Gibson but that his plan was to resolve the matter âvery quickly, through negotiation.â
âIt is my aim to do so â and you share this aim â in such a manner as to ensure complete confidentiality, absolutely no press coverage and a principled way of handling such that you and MG may, should you wish, maintain a relationship together,â he wrote in a retainer letter. He explained that his firm and the attorney who had referred her to him, Joseph Cotchett, would each get a 5% contingency fee.
Before Grigorieva officially hired George, the lawyer discussed making a $20-million demand, according to e-mails they exchanged. The singer instructed him not to reveal a dollar figure to Gibsonâs lawyers right away. âIâm just really fearful that would turn him angry and will end thisâ relationship, she wrote.
George agreed but added, âIf his proposal is completely absurd, Iâll offer my opinion that itâs unrealistic, as I donât want to create any false impression u can be bought off for pennies.â
Five days later, George met with Gibsonâs estate planning attorney, Michele Mulrooney. Her notes indicate that the conversation was vague when it came to what evidence Grigorieva had and how much money she wanted.
âOnly a substantial sum was mentioned several times â would ruin his career if the evidence got out,â Mulrooney wrote.
The next day, George played snippets of the tapes for Gibsonâs entertainment lawyer, Thomas Hansen. â$10M for her, including child support. $10M for Lucia. ... Give guarantee of mouth shut,â Hansen wrote in his notes.
Gibsonâs side viewed the situation as extortion and consulted a criminal attorney, a source familiar with the talks said. The line between extortion and aggressive settlement negotiations can be fuzzy, experts said, but in general, threatening civil litigation to get a financial settlement is legal, while threatening criminal prosecution or public disgrace is not.
The attorney Gibsonâs side consulted agreed that the actor was being extorted but warned that if he pressed charges, the tapes would become public â probably within days, the source said. From a public-relations standpoint, the timing couldnât have been worse. Gibson was trying to reclaim a place in Hollywood. He had a movie â âEdge of Darknessâ â in theaters, had just finished a film with Jodie Foster and was in talks to direct Leonardo DiCaprio in a Viking epic. Tapes of him enraged and hurling racial epithets would ruin any chance of a comeback. His camp decided to pay, the source said.
Gibsonâs attorneys made a proposal six days later â an $18-million package for Lucia, who is now 16 months old, and Grigorieva, paid out over two decades. It included cash, child-support payments, life insurance on Gibson, a college fund and the house. The couple would share custody. The photographs and recordings would be locked in a safe deposit box that required a court order or the signatures of George and Hansen to be opened.
Texting Gibson that night, Grigorieva appeared unaware of the $18-million proposal but complained that past proposals to provide for Lucia were less generous than those for his seven other children. âU threated [sic] her as an illegitimate child. Thatâs why I played the tapes,â she wrote.
Gibson told her not to âlet the lawyers run you. ⊠They always do this. They wrangle. Get us mad and they make more money.â
A few days later, her lawyers countered with a $26-million package that gave Grigorieva custody of their child, with Gibson entitled to âreasonableâ visitation.
With the proposals far apart, the sides set a May mediation.
In the meantime, Gibson and Grigorieva continued communicating. When she traveled to Russia in April, Gibson e-mailed that he had given Lucia a glow-in-the-dark rosary. âI have said prayers for you too,â he wrote.
In a May 2 e-mail, Grigorieva offered explanations for the recordings, writing first that she wanted Gibson to âhear for yourself what you sound like once you are enragedâ and later describing the tapes as insurance against potential attempts by Gibsonâs entourage to âtarnish my reputation in order not take care of me financially and take the baby away.â
âIf not for these recorded messages, you and your loyal people would have used any dirty trick they could,â she wrote.
Two weeks later, the parties gathered in a downtown L.A. law office with two retired judges as mediators. Grigorievaâs team threatened an embarrassing civil suit with the tapes as evidence. Gibsonâs attorneys said they would have her prosecuted for illegally recording him.
They reached an agreement that spanned 20 years and amounted to nearly $11 million for Lucia and more than $5 million for Grigorieva, who would also get a Steinway piano from Gibsonâs Malibu home. Custody was to be split. The deal required that âall evidenceâ â a reference to the photos and recordings â âbe destroyed in a manner agreed upon both parties.â
After two days, they reached an agreement. âHopefully it wonât fall apart,â retired judge Enrique Romero wrote to George.
But it did. Grigorieva said she was pressured into a deal with provisions, including joint custody, that she opposed. She got another lawyer, divorce attorney Manley Freid, and in June sought a temporary restraining order based on the alleged January assault. Taking the matter to court infuriated Gibsonâs lawyers, who denounced Freid for failing to inform the judge of the mediated agreement and derided the idea that Grigorieva had been in fear for six months.
âThis is a contrived additional attempt to extract â I will be generous â to extract money from Mr. Gibson with no foundation and no basis,â Gibson attorney Stephen Kolodny told the judge, according to a hearing transcript.
The judge directed Gibson to stay away from Grigorieva and ordered the recordings turned over to the court for safekeeping. Shortly thereafter, excerpts began appearing on Radar Online, a celebrity website. Grigorieva denied having anything to do with the leaks. But the prediction by Kolodny that the recordings posed âa clear and present danger to Mr. Gibsonâs futureâ proved true. His talent agency dropped him, the stars of âThe Hangoverâ revolted when he was offered a spot in the sequel, and the Viking picture stalled.
Grigorieva has cycled through attorneys, and she and George are battling in mediation over whether she must pay his contingency fee for the May agreement.
After the tapes became public, Gibsonâs lawyers, including criminal specialist Blair Berk, met with investigators. Subsequently, the Sheriffâs Department, which was looking into the assault allegations, announced the extortion inquiry.
Over the last six months, Major Crimes Bureau detectives have seized copies of Grigorievaâs computer hard drive and interviewed those involved in the settlement talks, including Grigorieva and her lawyers. Investigators have not revealed the full scope of their inquiry, but Whitmore, the sheriffâs spokesman, acknowledged that âone of the things looked at was, is it actual extortion or legal negotiation â something that attorneys do all the time?â
A lawyer for Grigorieva, Daniel Horowitz, denied that she had engaged in extortion and said, âWhen all the facts are known, people will learn that she loved Mel Gibson and never intended to hurt him.â
It's a date
Get our L.A. Goes Out newsletter, with the week's best events, to help you explore and experience our city.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.