Is Facebook worth it? Film execs confide they may cut movie ads
Hollywood’s friendship with Facebook is showing signs of strain.
The entertainment industry was among the first to embrace the Silicon Valley phenomenon. Studio executives thought the giant social network held great promise in reaching moviegoers for less money than traditional advertising such as trailers and TV ads. Facebook’s origins even became fodder for the 2010 Academy Award-winning movie “The Social Network.”
These days, major studios are taking a hard look at the cost of winning friends on Facebook. Some industry executives are increasingly skeptical that Facebook ads and promotional campaigns that ask users to “like” a movie can deliver big box-office returns.
“For people who are actually looking at the research and are looking for return on investment, for metrics that indicate specifically what Facebook’s role is in the movie marketing equation, the jury’s still out,” said Jim Gallagher, a movie marketing consultant who formerly oversaw marketing for Walt Disney Studios.
Fred Leach, Facebook Inc.'s head of entertainment measurement, said the Menlo Park, Calif., company is working more closely than ever with Hollywood studios to help them target the right audience for a film, including giving studios more data showing the connection between ads and movie ticket sales and more tools to track the effectiveness of Facebook campaigns.
In Hollywood, few are openly critical of the world’s biggest social networking company.
“Facebook continues to be an important advertising partner,” said Dwight Caines, president of worldwide digital marketing at Sony Pictures Entertainment. “They are on every campaign we do today.”
But other film executives confide privately they are considering cutting their spending on Facebook ads, just as carmaker General Motors Co. did last year, when the nation’s third-largest advertiser dropped its annual $10-million Facebook campaign after deciding the ads didn’t help sell cars.
The skirmish with Hollywood comes at a sensitive time for Facebook. The company, under pressure from Wall Street to grow revenue after its initial public stock offering in May, is competing with other social media for a share of the estimated $1.5 billion a year each major studio spends promoting movies globally.
Part of the problem is that studios are being asked to pay for the exposure they once got for free.
For years, studios have set up Facebook fan pages to connect with moviegoers, sending photos, video clips and other updates to the News Feed of users who “liked” a particular film, at no cost to the studios.
Then, in September, Facebook made a change to the algorithm that decides what users see in their News Feed. Facebook says it made the shift because users were tagging posts with negative feedback.
Major brands, including Hollywood studios, have seen a dramatic decline in the number of fans who see their messages.
For example, 72% of movies and network TV shows experienced a drop in the number of people who saw new Facebook posts after the new algorithm launched, according to BlitzMetrics, a Facebook marketing firm that analyzed 9 billion page posts generated over a 60-day period before and after the change.
That decline took a toll on two factors marketers watch closely: reach and engagement.
Twenty-three percent of the biggest studio pages saw a reduction in “engaged” users — people who click on a post, share it with friends or write a comment — because of decreased exposure in the News Feed, BlitzMetrics found. The drop in “reach” — the number of people who saw these updates from the most popular film and TV sites — was even sharper: 45%.
The change in the algorithm coincided with a push from Facebook to get studios to buy ads in the News Feed.
Social media experts say studios will have to find new ways to appeal to users and interact with them more. Pages that get a lot of likes and comments are favored by Facebook’s algorithm.
Some studios are responding by bringing in their own writers and production teams to help create more engaging campaigns. Studios will also have to place ads to recapture the attention of their audience on Facebook, the experts said.
“The days of free traffic are over,” said Dennis Yu, founder of BlitzMetrics. “Facebook has been trying to educate marketers on how to be social — to post the most engaging content — so as not to be penalized by their algorithms.”
To be sure, movie studios haven’t turned their backs on Facebook and its 1 billion-plus users around the globe. Every major holiday film — including “Twilight: Breaking Dawn — Part 2,” “Skyfall,” “Lincoln,” “The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey” and “Les Miserables” — has a splashy presence on the site.
Facebook’s Leach said 99% of all films released this year advertised on the social network, although he declined to say how much the studios spent.
“There are so many people on Facebook, it is a good place to have a presence — as a reminder. We buy the billboards in Westwood too — a lot of traffic drives past those,” said one marketing executive who spoke on condition of anonymity for fear of angering Facebook. “It doesn’t mean your film will not open if you don’t have that. The correlation is probably minimal. But when we’re opening a movie, we want to be in as many relevant places as we can.”
At the same time, studios have been turning to the next generation of social media players, including Twitter, Tumblr and Pinterest, said Todd Steinman, chief executive of the social media marketing agency M80.
“Nothing exists in a vacuum. You’ve got all these platforms that have emerged,” Steinman said. “Facebook is still the behemoth, but for immediacy and for intelligence and for market penetration, I think Twitter has probably surpassed it as far as a marketing vehicle for movies that are coming out.”
The evolution of Summit Entertainment’s digital strategy over the four-year run of the “Twilight” series is a case study in how studios traverse digital platforms to keep up with a movie’s fan base.
For “Twilight,” the first film in the blockbuster series, released in 2008, the studio focused on Myspace, the dominant social network at that time. By the following year, Facebook and Twitter both figured prominently in campaigns for the first sequel, “Twilight: New Moon.”
With the final installment in the “Twilight” saga now in theaters, Summit added two more digital outlets, letting fans listen to and share music from all the films in the franchise on online music service Spotify and encouraging them to pin images from the film to personal pinboards on Pinterest for their friends to see and share.
Still, Facebook dwarfs all of its competitors.
“When you are marketing a movie, you want to reach the widest audience possible to get people talking about it,” EMarketer analyst Debra Williamson said. “Facebook still has that hands down compared to Twitter.”
Social media marketing efforts are a drop in the promotional bucket that splashes money on TV ads and movie trailers. Kantar Media estimates studios spent nearly $2.9 billion on television ads in the U.S. alone in 2011.
Television commercials, in-theater previews and word of mouth remain the primary factors that influence a moviegoer’s decision to see a movie, according to Vincent Bruzzese, president of Ipsos’ Motion Picture Group.
“I still think [Facebook is] one of the most powerful marketing inventions of all time,” said Ben Carlson, president of the research firm Fizziology, which uses social media to forecast box-office results. “But it’s not a one-size-fits-all, write a check, and magic happens. It’s not a cure-all.”
Questions about the role of Facebook in movie marketing campaigns come at a time when studios are looking to cut moviemaking costs, including the film prints and advertising expenses known in the industry by the shorthand term P&A.;
Facebook is “a super-duper expensive piece of real estate, and it’s only one part of the old ball and chain of P&A;,” said veteran marketing executive Terry Press, co-president of CBS Films. “It’s not like you can do only Facebook. If you could open a movie on Facebook, that’s all you would have to buy. But it isn’t.”
Chmielewski reported from Los Angeles, and Guynn from San Francisco.
From the Oscars to the Emmys.
Get the Envelope newsletter for exclusive awards season coverage, behind-the-scenes stories from the Envelope podcast and columnist Glenn Whipp’s must-read analysis.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.