With time short before Monday’s caucuses in Iowa kick off the presidential nominating contests, Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders are deploying high-profile supporters and sharpening their stump speeches as a new poll showed the competition between the Democratic front-runners as tight as it ever has been.
Clinton was joined by Gabrielle Giffords, the former Arizona congresswoman wounded in a mass shooting five years ago, during a Saturday rally where the candidate repeated her call for tougher gun control measures.
She’s also ramped up her criticism of Sanders’ proposal for a government-run healthcare system, warning voters Friday that it could jeopardize gains made under President Obama while opening a “terrible debate” over an idea that will “never, ever happen.”
Sanders also made pointed references to Clinton’s support on Wall Street, including speaking fees she’s received from firms like Goldman Sachs.
“We do not raise our money from Wall Street, from investment banks, the pharmaceutical industry,” he said. “We are raising our money from the middle class and working families of this country.”
The battle between Sanders and Clinton reflects a long-running fault line between the liberal and centrist wings of the Democratic Party, and Sanders’ potential for a strong performance in the caucuses depends largely on his ability to convince voters that his uncompromising vision is worthy of support.
“There’s always a conflict between the purists and the pragmatists,” said Dennis Goldford, a political science professor at Drake University in Des Moines.
The closely watched Des Moines Register poll, which was released in partnership with Bloomberg on Saturday, showed Clinton leading 45% to 42% among likely Democratic caucusgoers.
A third candidate, former Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley, trailed with 3%. The margin of error for the poll, which was conducted Jan. 26-29, was plus or minus 4 percentage points.
Despite the tightness of the race, there were some signs of strength for Clinton. While 69% of Sanders supporters said their minds were made up, a significantly larger portion of Clinton’s backers, 83%, said the same thing.
Seeking any kind of edge going into the caucuses, the campaigns repeatedly fired accusations at each other Saturday over whether to add more debates in the coming months, the latest turn in a long-running subplot in the Democratic campaign.
Both campaigns announced Saturday that they had agreed to four more debates on top of the original six organized by the Democratic National Committee. But in a sign of how fraught the primary battle had become, they spent the day sparring publicly over exactly when and where the contests would be held.
At one point, Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta said a debate should be held in Flint, Mich., to help draw attention to the ongoing crisis of lead poisoning in the city’s water. Clinton has claimed credit for focusing national interest on the situation by talking about it on the trail and dispatching a top aide to the city.
“Why won’t they debate in Brooklyn?” Weaver said in a statement. “What’s the matter with Brooklyn?”
In his exasperated reply, Podesta said the Clinton campaign was ready to work out a deal. “There is nothing worse than a debate about debates,” he said. “Enough of the games.”