Advertisement

Readers React:  A focus on postal heroes

Letter carrier Felipe Raymundo moves a tray of mail to his truck to begin delivery Monday, Dec. 5, 2011, at a post office in Seattle.

Letter carrier Felipe Raymundo moves a tray of mail to his truck to begin delivery Monday, Dec. 5, 2011, at a post office in Seattle.

(Elaine Thompson / AP)
Share

To the editor: Your story on the heroic actions of nine letter carriers — including two veterans from California — whom we honored for protecting or saving lives on their mail routes closed inexplicably with unrelated, misleading sentences. (“Postal carrier heroics: Saving shooting victims and rescuing people from burning homes,” Oct. 9)

The article said: “Such award ceremonies are meant (also) … to help brighten a struggling agency.” No, the National Heroes annual event always has been about recognizing letter carriers who have gone above and beyond.

The story then raised financial issues and a controversial think tank study calling for partial privatization.

Advertisement

Postal finances, including the Postal Service’s billion-dollar-plus operating profit last year and this year without taxpayer money, merit serious discussion. But that’s not achieved by shoehorning three disjointed paragraphs into a story about letter carriers who risked their lives to help others.

Fredric Rolando, Washington

The writer is president of the National Assn. of Letter Carriers.

Follow the Opinion section on Twitter @latimesopinion and Facebook

Advertisement