White nationalists’ ‘man in the White House’? Bannon appointment provokes angry rebukes
Steve Bannon was one of Donald Trump’s closest confidants and most determined field lieutenants throughout the presidential campaign; now he has become President-elect Trump’s first major postelection political problem.
The angry backlash against Trump’s announcement that the Breitbart News executive would serve as his chief White House strategist gave dispirited Democrats and other critics of the president-elect a rallying point Monday. Mainstream Jewish and Muslim groups warned that Trump was elevating an enthusiastic promoter of white nationalism to a desk steps from the Oval Office.
Republican lawmakers — many of whom have their own reasons for disliking Bannon — were not inclined to defend him.
“I’ve never met the guy,” House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.) said on CNN, adding that “I trust Donald’s judgment.”
“I do not know Steve Bannon,” House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Bakersfield) said as he repeatedly parried questions from reporters at a news conference Monday morning.
That reluctance to actively defend Trump’s choice came as no surprise. Bannon is, after all, a man who said in a 2004 interview with the Daily Beast that “I want to bring everything crashing down, and destroy all of today’s establishment.”
He repeatedly has made clear that he does not exempt the Republican leadership from that desired fate.
The fight over his appointment underscored the continued tension between the party leadership and Trump. The president-elect clearly values Bannon’s strategic advice and relied heavily on him to pilot his campaign in its closing months. But whether Trump can navigate the conflict within the party — and what role Bannon plays in doing so — could be central to whether the new administration can succeed.
All that left Bannon where he has been throughout his career — in a bunker exchanging fire with what he derisively calls the forces of “political correctness.”
Only the stakes had suddenly become much higher.
The rage that many civil rights activists and leaders of minority groups have toward Bannon has been swelling for years, long before Trump brought him into the inner sanctum of his operation.
For many, Bannon personifies the so-called alt-right, which the Anti-Defamation League in a statement Sunday night denounced as “a loose-knit group of white nationalists and unabashed anti-Semites and racists.” Indeed, Bannon’s appointment to Trump’s campaign this year had drawn praise from former Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke and neo-Nazi organizations.
His father, Martin, still lives in the neighborhood. His younger brother, Mike, recently recounted to the local newspaper how he was constantly getting called to the neighborhood pool as a teenager to drag his brother out of a fight.
Bannon signed up for the Navy directly out of college, became an officer, left in 1983 for Harvard Business School, then landed a job at Goldman Sachs. His subsequent years in investment banking made him rich, and Hollywood production credits added yet more intrigue to his biography.
He picked up something else, as well: His experiences with the self-satisfied nature of America’s financial and cultural elites made him angry, he says.
“I went to Harvard Business School, worked at Goldman Sachs,” he told a Times reporter in 2010. “I know about elites, I know about the contempt that they hold. They hold the basic heartland of this country in contempt.”
Bannon became a close friend and patron of Andrew Breitbart, and took over operations of his news organization in 2012, when Breitbart died suddenly of heart failure at age 43.
At Breitbart, Bannon’s antagonisms manifested themselves in coverage that routinely referred negatively to Muslims, inner-city minorities and women, among other groups. Often the facts were suspect, as when Breitbart wrote about an extremely flawed poll’s finding that more than half of American Muslims wanted sharia law, or suggested that Hillary Clinton’s aide, Huma Abedin, might be a Saudi operative.
One Breitbart writer declared “America has a Muslim problem” and made clear he was not talking about extremist Muslims, but all Muslims.
The headline of one Breitbart story screamed: “Birth control makes women unattractive and crazy.” Another headline referred to William Kristol, the editor of the conservative magazine the Weekly Standard and an opponent of Trump’s, as a “renegade Jew.”
GOP strategist Kurt Bardella, who said he talked to Bannon almost daily for two years while working as Breitbart’s media consultant, described him as “the ideological driving force behind Breitbart and its content.”
“He put himself front and center,” said Bardella, who parted ways with Breitbart as the site became something he saw as “toxic and perpetually malcontent.”
Bannon’s allies, however, call talk of racism outrageous. On Monday, as the denunciations of Bannon mounted, Breitbart employees quickly signed onto what had all the appearances of a traditional crisis-communications exercise, releasing statements painting Bannon as a sensitive and sympathetic employer — even someone who prizes diversity.
That portrait contrasts with the one that emerged in court filings. In 2007, during divorce proceedings, Bannon’s then-wife alleged that he repeatedly made anti-Semitic remarks as the couple toured Los Angeles private schools for their daughters.
She said Bannon had asked the director of the Westland School “why there were so many Hanukkah books in the library.” He was concerned that the Willows Community School “used to be in a temple,” she alleged in a court filing.
In a deposition, referring to Bannon’s reaction to another prominent private school, she said that “the biggest problem he had with Archer is the number of Jews that attend. He said that he doesn’t like Jews and that he doesn’t like the way they raise their kids to be ‘whiny brats,’ and that he didn’t want the girls going to school with Jews.”
Bannon, who ultimately sent his children to Archer for middle school and high school, has denied ever making any such comments.
“This is what they will do to anybody who defeats the left, “ said Joel Pollak, a Breitbart journalist in California who is an Orthodox Jew.
“There are no Nazis here, no white nationalists here,” Pollak said, of the Breitbart newsroom. “If our articles appeal to people beyond our core audience, there is nothing I can do about that.”
“We are what we have always been,” he said, “a voice for the conservative movement.”
Times staff writers Michael A. Memoli in Washington and Robin Abcarian in Los Angeles contributed to this report.
Follow me: @evanhalper
5:35 p.m.: This article was updated with background on Bannon’s upbringing and Breitbart News, as well as comments by Breibart journalist Joel Pollak.
This article was originally published at 10:50 a.m.
The view from Sacramento
For reporting and exclusive analysis from bureau chief John Myers, get our California Politics newsletter.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.