Judge denies GOP attempt to stop Wisconsin election lawsuit
A federal judge in Wisconsin on Wednesday declined a request by Republicans to dismiss a lawsuit brought by Democrats seeking to make it easier to vote in the August state primary and November presidential elections.
The Republican National Committee, the state Republican Party and the GOP-controlled Wisconsin Legislature asked for the dismissal of the lawsuit brought by the Democratic National Committee and Wisconsin Democratic Party. But U.S. District Judge William Conley said in his order Wednesday that the case should move ahead quickly so it could be resolved far ahead of the elections.
He set a June 29 hearing to discuss the lawsuit, which was filed before the April 7 presidential primary election and consolidated with two other cases. A fourth federal lawsuit, filed by Disability Rights Wisconsin and others, has also since been filed seeking additional changes in the law to make it easier to vote.
Republicans oppose all of the lawsuits.
Democratic National Committee Chairman Tom Perez heralded the ruling, saying Republicans are trying to use the coronavirus outbreak to keep people from voting.
“They want to weaponize the pandemic,” Perez said during a conference call. “They are clearly hellbent on suppressing the vote.”
Attorneys for the Wisconsin Legislature and the state and national Republican parties did not immediately respond to a message seeking comment.
The state will be a major battleground in the presidential election in November.
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled just a day before the April election to block Democratic efforts to extend absentee voting. Democrats amended the lawsuit after that election, arguing that changes are still needed in light of in-person voting challenges caused by the pandemic.
Wisconsin, a closely divided battleground state, is first to hold an election amidst the pandemic
“As was amply demonstrated in the fire drill leading up to the April election, the longer this court delays, the less [likely] constitutional relief to voters is going to be effective and the more likely that relief may cause voter confusion and burden election officials charged with its administration,” Conley wrote.
The lawsuit Conley allowed to move forward seeks to: do away with the requirement that proof of address and a photo ID be provided with voter registration and absentee ballot applications submitted electronically and by mail; extend the electronic and by-mail registration deadlines to the Friday before both elections; extend the deadline for clerks to receive absentee ballots from 8 p.m. on election day to within 10 days of the election; and suspend the requirement that absentee ballots include a witness’ signature.
Republicans have dug in against Democratic proposals to expand mail-in balloting this fall as a fight over election rules becomes increasingly bitter.
Conley said he was unlikely to rule in favor of Democrats on issues that had been repeatedly upheld in federal courts, including the law requiring Wisconsin voters to provide documentary proof of residency when registering to vote.
Democrats also argued that the state must ensure there are “safe and sufficient” places to vote in person across Wisconsin. Conley ordered the Wisconsin Elections Commission to address by June 25 what steps it was taking to prepare for the elections and whether it believed any of the changes sought in the lawsuit would improve administration of the elections.
The commission consists of an equal number of Republicans and Democrats and is unlikely to vote for or against any of the changes sought by the lawsuit.
The state is a
The long-standing wrangle over voting rights and election security has come to a head in Georgia.
Get our Essential Politics newsletter
The latest news, analysis and insights from our politics teams from Sacramento to D.C.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.