2020 election will shape global warming as U.S. exit from Paris climate pact looms
What happens on election day will, to some degree, determine how much hotter and nastier the world’s climate is likely to get, experts say.
The day after the presidential election, the United States will formally leave the 2015 Paris agreement to fight climate change. A year ago, President Trump’s administration notified the United Nations that America is exiting the climate agreement, and Nov. 4 is the earliest a country can withdraw.
The U.S., the world’s second biggest carbon polluter, will be the first country to quit the 189-nation agreement, which asks countries to make voluntary, ever-tighter goals to curb emissions of heat-trapping gases. The only mandatory parts of the agreement cover tracking and reporting of carbon pollution, according to U.S. officials who were part of the Paris negotiations.
Former Vice President Joe Biden has pledged to put the country immediately back in the Paris agreement, a move that doesn’t require congressional approval. Experts say that a U.S. absence of three months — from November until the January inauguration — will not change the world, but four years will.
If America pulls back from the Paris agreement and stronger carbon-cutting efforts, some other nations will be less likely to cut back as well, so the withdrawal’s impact will be magnified, scientists and climate negotiators said.
Trump and Biden hold radically different views on environmental policy and climate change. Here’s what voters can expect from the next president.
“Losing most of the world’s coral reefs is something that would be hard to avoid if the U.S. remains out of the Paris process,” said climate scientist Zeke Hausfather of the Breakthrough Institute in Oakland. “At the margins, we would see a world of more extreme heat waves.”
If the U.S. remains out of the climate pact, today’s children are “going to see big changes that you and I don’t see for ice, coral and weather disasters,” said Stanford University’s Rob Jackson, who studies humans’ impact on the planet.
Because the two presidential candidates have starkly different positions on climate change policy, the election could have profound repercussions for the world’s approach to the problem, according to more than a dozen experts.
“That election could be a make-or-break point for international climate policy,” said Niklas Hoehne, a climate scientist at Wageningen University in the Netherlands.
In pulling out of the agreement, Trump has questioned climate science and has rolled back environmental initiatives that aimed to reduce future carbon pollution from power plants and cars, calling them too restrictive.
American carbon emissions dropped by less than 1% a year from 2016-19, until plunging — probably temporarily — during the pandemic slowdown, according to the U.S. Department of Energy. More than 60 countries cut emissions by higher percentages than the U.S. in that time period, according to international data.
“Other countries around the world are obsessed with the Paris Climate Accord, which shackles economies and has done nothing to reduce greenhouse gas emissions,” White House spokesman Judd Deere said in an email. “President Trump understands economic growth and environmental protection do not need to conflict.”
How close can U.S. cities, states and companies get to meeting the country’s abandoned climate goals without help from the federal government?
“We’ve also done our fair share” to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, U.S. Secretary of State Michael R. Pompeo said Wednesday in the Maldives, a climate-vulnerable country. “We stand amongst industrialized nations as a beacon, and we did it not through state-driven, forced rulesets, but rather through creativity and innovation and good governance.”
In the last debate and on his website, Biden pledged to set a goal of zero net carbon emissions from the U.S. by 2050. At that point, the country would not put more greenhouse gases into the air than it takes out through trees and other natural and technological sources. Dozens of nations, including top-polluting China, have already made similar pledges.
Eleven years ago, the world was on pace to add about another 5 degrees, or 2.8 degrees Celsius, of warming. But with pledges to cut emissions from Paris and afterward, the world now faces only about another 2.2 degrees, or 1.2 degrees Celsius, of warming if countries do what they promise, Hoehne said.
“If Biden wins, the whole world is going to start reorienting toward stepping up its action,” said climate scientist Jonathan Overpeck, dean of the University of Michigan’s environment program.
If the U.S. remains out of the Paris accord, countries trying to make drastic cuts to their emissions at potentially high costs to local industry may put “border adjustment” fees on climate laggards like America to even the playing field, said Nigel Purvis, a climate negotiator in the Clinton and George W. Bush administrations. The European Union is already talking about such fees, Purvis said.
Trevor Houser, a climate modeler for the independent Rhodium Group, and the computer simulation research group Climate Action Tracker ran calculations comparing a continuation of the Trump administration’s current emission trends with what would happen if Biden worked toward net zero emissions. Houser, who worked briefly in the Obama State Department, found that in the next 10 years a Trump scenario would emit 6 billion tons more greenhouse gases than the Biden scenario — an 11% difference.
Climate Action Tracker calculated that the reduction in U.S. emissions under the Biden scenario would cool the world by two-tenths of a degree (or one-tenth of a degree Celsius).
“Every tenth of a degree counts,” said Hoehne, a Climate Action Tracker team member. “We are running into a catastrophe if we don’t do anything.”
Other nations will do more to limit carbon pollution if the U.S. is doing so and less if America isn’t, said Cornell University climate scientist Natalie Mahowald. “In terms of leadership, it will make an immense difference,” she said.
The world is getting closer to passing a temperature limit set by global leaders five years ago and may exceed it in the next decade, a new U.N. report says.
In Paris, the U.S. was crucial in getting the agreement finished. The rest of the world ended up pledging to reduce roughly 5 tons of carbon pollution for every ton the U.S. promised to cut, according to Houser and Hausfather.
Nations also adopted a goal to limit future warming to just a few more tenths of a degree from now. A United Nations panel of scientists in 2018 said there was only a slim chance of reaching the goal, but said it would likely make a huge difference in helping avert more loss of corals, extreme weather and extinctions.
A second Trump win “could remove whatever vanishingly small chance we have of” not shooting past that stringent temperature goal, Hausfather said.
Must-read stories from the L.A. Times
Get all the day's most vital news with our Today's Headlines newsletter, sent every weekday morning.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.