Cannes 2014: The bafflement of Ryan Gosling's 'Lost River'

Ryan Gosling's 'Lost River' has prompted confusion. What does it mean for the star?
Ryan Gosling's next move? After his puzzling directorial debut, a very big question mark.
After its Cannes premiere, what will Warner Bros. do with Ryan Gosling's 'Lost River'?

Ryan Gosling's directorial debut, "Lost River," premiered Tuesday at the Cannes Film Festival, and as you may have heard, it prompted no shortage of head-scratching and confusion.

The movie itself is a puzzler. A single mother (Christina Hendricks) lives in a thinly veiled Detroit called Lost River, struggling to make ends meets as her house faces foreclosure (underwater double entendres likely intended) and demolition. She and her two children have few prospects.

What follows is a trip into the surreal, prompted in part by a well-meaning neighbor (Saoirse Ronan). The  plot‎ never moves with any particular velocity, and the kind of telling character moments that would come in its place are instead swapped for a series of surreal images, influenced by the likes of David Lynch and Nicolas Winding Refn. Bicycles and houses go up in flames; nightclubs are populated by psychedelic creations. Portentous music often plays‎ over it all.

There are moments that have a kind of cool‎-cinema chic, but they never coalesce into anything larger. Even by the standards of Impressionistic video art, the film feels highly disjointed.

But the bafflement isn't limited to the movie itself.

First, it's unclear what Gosling is after, careerwise, and, maybe more important, what effect this will have on his standing.‎ His fans remain loyal, and the sight outside the premiere Tuesday night of several young devotees trying to defend, or at least understand, the film had a certain poignance. (In the theater, a hard-core group hung in and gave him the customary long ovation, which he accepted with Cannes-standard waving and graciousness.)

And it's unlikely many of his fans will see the film anyway; after all, it's not only a challenging art house film but also one in which he doesn't appear.

But with this confounding choice — the latest in a series of them — one wonders how much longer fans will continue to worship Gosling as they have, building memes and following the details of the personal life for a star who has largely been removed from the ranks of mainstream cinema. In the short term this creates mystery; in the long term it can breed indifference.

There is precedent for an actor doing his wacky own thing and continuing to attract a following‎ (James Franco, anyone?), but personalities like that usually engage with fans in other ways, social media and the like, and Gosling shuns much of that.

A return to acting would of course help. He'd need to do something populist, or at least well-regarded. Gosling may not need another "The Notebook," but a "Blue Valentine" wouldn't hurt. You can challenge fans for only so long before nostalgia gives way to impatience.

The press strategy at the festival has been strange too. Ryan Gosling's best weapon is Ryan Gosling, his charming, forthcoming self often winning over reporters. But Gosling was little found on the fest's well-trod media circuit; he declined most if not all U.S. interviews, including a request from this paper. If the goal was to draw less attention to the film and avoid the hot seat for it, it worked. Unfortunately, in the process he also missed an opportunity to finesse some of the journalists now dissing the film, and who could also help build word of mouth at time of release.

‎Which brings us to the biggest question: Where does Warner Bros. go from here?

The studio, which boarded the project at an earlier development stage but gave Gosling a great degree of autonomy, has to decide when it will go, and how big. It's hardly an easy question. Trying to market the film would vex even the most savvy team (and Warners has one). A platform release is probably the best approach, but can the studio go so narrow and risk offending such a prized relationship? And even if it does, will the niche box office that results hurt, not to put too fine a point on it, one of its more valuable brands?

First features, especially those made with a lot of independence, can yield some complicated images on the screen. But that's nothing compared with what's created off it.

Copyright © 2014, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
  • Artists and filmmakers make surprising leaps in 2014
    Artists and filmmakers make surprising leaps in 2014

    Exhibiting raw promise is one thing, but to exceed those initial flashes is something really special. Throughout this year, many filmmakers and performers were pressing on in remarkable ways, showing that even artists who have already exhibited notable skill, talent and accomplishment still...

  • Mark Olsen's best indie films of 2014
    Mark Olsen's best indie films of 2014

    Throughout the year people you thought you knew showed they were still full of surprises. In 2014, when some would see cinema as a storytelling mode and cultural force as an endangered species, these are vital signs of life. Here is Mark Olsen's top ten list of independent films:

  • Kenneth Turan's best films of 2014
    Kenneth Turan's best films of 2014

    What's the point of doing a 10 best list if you put only 10 films on it?

  • Daring films lifted the artform in 2014
    Daring films lifted the artform in 2014

    Like voices crying in the wilderness — rising above that vast wasteland of movie mediocrity — came the roar of the auteurs in 2014. A rangy group with varying aesthetics, they've left an indelible imprint on cinema despite the 400 or so of the marginal that clogged our theaters...

  • Everyone loses in a December deluge of films
    Everyone loses in a December deluge of films

    I try not to publicly argue with film legends, even those who are no longer alive. But when Mae West famously said that "too much of a good thing can be wonderful," she clearly was not considering a film critic's lot in December.

  • Goodbyes abound in 'Night at the Museum' as trilogy comes to an end
    Goodbyes abound in 'Night at the Museum' as trilogy comes to an end

    "Night at the Museum: Secret of the Tomb," otherwise known as "Night at the Museum 3," rates as more determinedly heartfelt than the first and not as witty as the second (and best). Also, no Amy Adams as Amelia Earhart in jodhpurs this time around.