House Republican leaders plan to raise debt ceiling

WILLIAMSBURG, Va. — House Republican leaders abruptly announced they would vote next week to temporarily extend the nation’s debt limit, sharply reducing the threat that the government might default on its obligations, but leaving the party still divided as it casts about for the best way to pressure President Obama for more budget cuts.

The move Friday by Republican leaders, who have been holed up for days at an annual retreat at a snow-dusted private resort in Virginia, is a turnaround for the party. Until recently, Republicans had touted the debt ceiling as a prime point of leverage they could use in their battle with Obama over spending.

Many Republicans, particularly in the House, are still smarting from the tax hikes on the wealthy the president won in the New Year’s Day “fiscal cliff” deal. They are primed to fight for cuts to Medicare and other domestic programs, while seeking to divert Obama from his priorities on gun violence and immigration.

But House Speaker John A. Boehner of Ohio and other members of the leadership have been warning their restive members that a fight over the debt ceiling risked harm to the economy for which Republicans probably would receive the blame. They have been looking for a way to sidestep a battle that they feared could further damage the party’s standing with voters.

The new plan would raise the debt limit, which currently stands at $16.4 trillion, for a few months in exchange for a promise that the Democratic-controlled Senate will not miss the traditional April 15 deadline to pass its budget — a habit that has irked conservatives. Instead of staging a spending fight over the debt ceiling, Republicans would aim at one of two budget deadlines to come up in March.

To compel senators to comply with the budget requirement, the plan calls for their pay to be withheld if the deadline passes without action. That provision, however, may not pass constitutional muster. The 27th Amendment provides that “no law, varying the compensation” of members of Congress, can take effect until after an intervening election. The amendment was passed to prevent a Congress from voting itself a raise, but may also prohibit withholding a member’s pay, constitutional lawyers and some congressional members said.

Even without the debate over pay, the proposal substantially departs from past Republican demands that any increase in the debt ceiling be matched, dollar for dollar, with spending cuts. That standard sparked a standoff in 2011 between Boehner and Obama that brought the nation to the brink of a first-ever credit default and launched budget battles that are ongoing.

Some Democratic leaders in Congress panned the overture — Rep. Nancy Pelosi of San Francisco, the minority leader, called it a “gimmick” in a statement released by her spokesman. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada was noncommittal.

White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said, “We are encouraged that there are signs that congressional Republicans may back off their insistence on holding our economy hostage.”

Conservative leaders said they supported the plan, but some rank-and-file members remained noncommittal. Whether Boehner would have the necessary votes remained unclear.

If the plan passes, it would remove one immediate problem for Boehner and his colleagues but would leave in place a more fundamental challenge: the continuing Republican division over what spending cuts to push for and how to go about it.

On the one side are conservative activists, including many freshly elected lawmakers, who want to take every opportunity to exact a price from Obama. On the other are many outside advisors, including former George W. Bush strategist Karl Rove and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, who have warned lawmakers to pick their battles and avoid a repeat of the politically and economically damaging 2011 showdown.

At the retreat in Virginia, rank-and-file lawmakers waited dozens deep for a chance at the microphone during a free-for-all session that ran into overtime. The unsettled nature of the gathering was underscored by the titles of the sessions being held in the plantation-themed meeting rooms, including “What Happened and Where are We Now?”

“The sad answer is there really isn’t a good strategy,” said Vin Weber, a former member of Congress and longtime GOP consultant. “One of the reasons I think Republicans are demoralized right now is there isn’t an easy way to make the spending cuts.”

Approving a debt ceiling increase would be a blow to the conservative flank, including those who launched a failed coup against Boehner’s return to the speaker’s chair this month, and their powerful supporters off Capitol Hill.

Still, Boehner’s plan was gaining traction with lawmakers, who said they had learned they have greater strength if they remain united.

“We all know this is an important 90 days,” said Rep. Tom Cole (R-Okla.), a Boehner ally. “It’s important for the country; it’s important politically, I think, in terms of how we’re regarded in the country.”

If the House approves a debt ceiling extension, the next budget deadline would occur March 1, when $1.2 trillion in automatic spending cuts are scheduled to begin taking effect. Republicans believe they have leverage over Obama in a fight over those cuts, known as a sequester, because he opposes the idea of slashing deeply across Pentagon and domestic accounts.

A second deadline would come on March 27, when the law funding government agencies expires. If Congress fails to pass a new appropriations law by then, government departments will have to shut down.

lisa.mascaro@latimes.com

michael.memoli@latimes.com