Voices of experience

New Hampshire went for Clinton and McCain. Now, both must show voters the future, not the past.
January 9, 2008

» Discuss Article    (61 Comments)

It is Hillary Rodham Clinton's misfortune to have spent a long and honorable career building up the experience that would qualify her to be a serious candidate for president of the United States -- only to come to the apex of that career just as the nation decided that experience isn't everything. She squeaked out a victory on Tuesday, but across the wintry plains of Iowa and the unseasonably mild hills of New Hampshire, large numbers of voters in the past five days have affirmed that they are looking forward, not back, and thus swarming to Barack Obama's thoughtful, eloquent expression of hope and away from Clinton's call of experience and readiness.

With two strong showings in two white states where Clinton once led by large margins, Obama has decisively rebutted questions about his electability. It was Clinton who challenged voters to consider whether her Democratic rival is ready to serve, who suggested that a vote for Obama was a gamble. To her chagrin, many voters in Iowa and New Hampshire were thrilled to take that risk. And yet, she rebounded with vigor, and demonstrated enough appeal to make a run to Feb. 5, when this race likely will be decided.

 
Some of the same dynamics are at work among Republicans. Suddenly Mitt Romney, a second-generation politician, looks far less appealing than the flinty independence of John McCain. There, the politics of change are murkier, complicated by McCain's enduring popularity in New Hampshire, Mike Huckabee's popularity with Christian conservatives and Romney's inability to convince voters that he is a man of genuine conviction. Still, for Republicans as well as Democrats, it's a tough year to be a candidate whose principal credential isexperience. Indeed, for Republicans it's a tough year to stand for anything, as the GOP remains in search of a standard-bearer.

Clinton's fade from front-runner to mere contender is not the result of her brief and dignified display of emotion on the campaign trail Monday. To the contrary, that episode may have helped spark her late turnaround, especially among women, for despite a shamefully sexist attempt to turn her remarks at a New Hampshire coffee shop into doubtsabout her fitness to serve, Clinton's comments revealed the passion she has for her country and the depth of her political beliefs. "I just don't want to see us fall backwards," she said, her voice tight. "This is very personal for me." She will be a stronger candidate going forward if she continues to express herself in such personal terms.

For Clinton, the trouble is not emotion but, perversely, President Bush. So badly has this president performed that he has discredited not just his own administration but the very idea of Washington knowledge. Voters frustrated by the war in Iraq and anxious about the economy have turned on the man who brought us those troubles and on experience itself -- and thus on Clinton. She still has time, but now she must confront an electorate that has its doubts -- and that has identified Obama with the future and Clinton with the past.




Post Comment

Name
Enter your comments and post to forum
By participating you agree to our Terms of Service and represent that you are not under the age of 13.
 
Discussion


Tell us your thoughts on today's editorial.

Comments will close after two weeks.
 
1. Moree Bush Hatred (BDS). You liberal losers need to get a life. Hillary has no accomplishments in public life. Zero. And George Bush has done an OK job. Far better than you.
Submitted by: ErrickBlair
11:18 AM PST, Jan 19, 2008
 
2. All you who go on about how Bush has raped and ruined the country - the economy's been strong for years now; the US is (hard to deny it now) winning in Iraq, and the Iraqis themselves seem happy now to see Saddam AND the insurgents gone or going; there's been no repeat of 9/11; France and Canada have elected relatively pro-American leaders, so international esteem for the US seems to be stabilizing, or rising; and your own protestations about Bush show that freedom of speech is alive and well. Seems life in the US right now is occasionally problematic, but on the whole not so bad. Sooo, how exactly has Bush ruined the country, by your lights?
Submitted by: puzzled
1:59 PM PST, Jan 11, 2008
 
3. What color is the sky in LA?? If Clinton loses; blame George Bush!! I can hear her concession speech now. "If W had not been President, I would have won." Yeah lady - and if "ifs" and "buts" were candy and nuts we would all have a merry Christmas!
Submitted by: Bob
11:46 AM PST, Jan 11, 2008
 



Editorial: His acceptance speech was designed to appeal beyond the GOP base. But where was the maverick?
   
The best in Southern California opinion journalism
In Friday's Letters to the Editor
Letters: Sarah, Sarah, Sarah!
more »
The business and culture of our digital lives, from the L.A. Times
Estelle, the poster child for artificial scarcity
For the better part of the last decade, the major record labels have been trying...
more »
 

ADVERTISEMENT



The Academy Award-winning actress sinks her teeth into the role of the legendary designer but these days, she's happy in sweats.