OpinionEditorial
Editorial

Building L.A. County segment would accelerate bullet train project

Public TransportationGlobal WarmingMetrolinkRailway Transportation
Building L.A. County segment would put bullet train on track
Building the Burbank-to-Palmdale section could help legitimize the bullet train project
A cap-and-trade deal will provide billions for the bullet train in the coming years

The "train to nowhere" is beginning to look a bit more like a train to somewhere. Flush with $250 million this year and the promise of billions more from the state's cap-and-trade program, the California High Speed Rail Authority has proposed accelerating plans to build the segment of the bullet train that will run through Los Angeles County. Officials intend to begin environmental analysis this summer on a train that could travel from Palmdale to Burbank in 15 minutes, even as construction continues on the first segment in the Central Valley. This is a good plan that could help legitimize the beleaguered project and could ultimately help get commuters out of their cars.

Critics have derided the project as a "train to nowhere" because the authority chose to begin construction with the Fresno-to-Bakersfield segment. While the Central Valley certainly isn't nowhere — it's a rapidly growing population center that deserves a good transit network — there was understandable frustration that urban areas with plenty of ready riders would have to wait for the benefits of high speed rail.

A Palmdale-to-Burbank segment addresses those concerns in two important ways. It could provide relief from one of Southern California's worst commutes — Metrolink takes 90 minutes and driving takes just as long — while also reducing car trips and thereby cutting greenhouse gas emissions. And it could do so in less than a decade. What's more, by building in the Central Valley and L.A. Basin concurrently, the authority increases the likelihood that the project will have the political support to get funded and that the full-fledged L.A.-to-San Francisco bullet train line will ultimately be built.

The new focus on the L.A. segment and other urban projects helped convince state legislators, like incoming Senate President Pro Tem Kevin de León (D-Los Angeles), to allocate $250 million this year in cap-and-trade money — basically, greenhouse gas emission fees charged to polluters — for high speed rail, and, more importantly, to set aside 25% of the cap-and-trade money collected in future years for the project. That deal will provide billions of dollars for the bullet train in the coming years and help keep the project moving while voter-approved bonds are tied up in lawsuits. Legislators also insisted that the authority deliver more reductions in greenhouse gas emissions in urban areas as quickly as possible.

To be sure, the bullet train still has its challenges. The total cost is expected to be $68 billion. Congressional Republicans are trying to block federal funding for the project, and there are numerous lawsuits pending, including one filed this month that alleges the train isn't a valid use of cap-and-trade funds because it won't help reduce greenhouse gas emissions. California leaders this year doubled down on the bullet train and they've wisely pushed to speed development of the project in L.A. Now they need rigorous oversight to keep the bullet train on track.

Copyright © 2014, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
Public TransportationGlobal WarmingMetrolinkRailway Transportation
  • Broaden the 'voluntary departure' settlement
    Broaden the 'voluntary departure' settlement

    Federal immigration agents often persuade migrants from Mexico suspected of being in the U.S. illegally to sign what are known as "voluntary departure" forms, in which the detainees agree to leave the country without a deportation hearing. Used properly, the process is an expedient...

  • What the Wilderness Act has taught us
    What the Wilderness Act has taught us

    Fifty years ago Wednesday, Lyndon Johnson strolled out to the Rose Garden, pressed a fountain pen between the fingers of his hefty right hand and signed into law the highest level of protection ever afforded the American landscape. "If future generations are to remember us with gratitude...

  • Some dam questions about the California drought
    Some dam questions about the California drought

    For Southern Californians, the current record-breaking drought means letting the lawn fade to a trendy golden brown and making sure the hose doesn’t water the asphalt while you’re washing your car. It does not mean wondering whether anything will come out of the faucet and,...

  • FCC should push Comcast to get Internet to more low-income families
    FCC should push Comcast to get Internet to more low-income families

    Promises, promises. To win federal regulators' approval for its acquisition of NBC Universal, cable giant Comcast promised in 2011 to offer low-cost Internet connections to millions of low-income households in its service area for three years. Now, eager for the green light to acquire...

  • The commander in chief should not also be the 'decider in chief'
    The commander in chief should not also be the 'decider in chief'

    Just before leaving for summer recess at the end of July, the House of Representatives turned to the issue of Iraq. Throughout June, President Obama had steadily increased the presence of U.S. troops in Iraq from an initial 275 to nearly 800. Military force had not yet been used, but the...

  • Hiking L.A.'s minimum wage is a no-brainer
    Hiking L.A.'s minimum wage is a no-brainer

    Of all major cities in the country, Los Angeles has the highest percentage of population living in poverty. After decades of slow job growth and stagnant wages, 28% of Angelenos — 1 million people — today live below the poverty line. Our city's African American and Latino...

Comments
Loading