Opinion
Get Opinion in your inbox -- sign up for our weekly newsletter
Editorial
Opinion Editorial
Editorial

Finally, a train to the plane in L.A.?

Los Angeles may be on the verge of fixing one of its worst transportation mistakes
An LAX people-mover could take L.A. where's it's never been

Los Angeles may be on the verge of fixing one of its worst transportation mistakes: the failure, two decades ago, to build a rail line to Los Angeles International Airport that lets travelers come and go on public transit easily, quickly and inexpensively.

On Thursday, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority's board of directors is being asked to move forward on a proposal to build a new light-rail station, two miles from the center of LAX, that would connect the Crenshaw Metro line to a monorail-like "people-mover" that would carry passengers to and from the terminals. Most big airports already have such shuttles to transport people from one terminal to another, to car rental hubs and to public transit; LAX does not. This failure of planning is one of the region's great embarrassments, and a sensible solution is long overdue.

If the Metro board approves the plan, it will stop studying more expensive proposals to bring the subway closer to the airport. Skeptics may wonder why they should celebrate Metro's recommendation to build a station two miles from the airport instead of inside the airport itself, and how this would be an improvement on the Green Line's existing Aviation/LAX station, which also stops about two miles from the terminals. In reality, the distance between the rail station and the airport is less important than the ease of the connection between the two. The existing LAX connection is extraordinarily inconvenient and underused. Travelers have to walk down from the train platform, wait at the curb, then haul their luggage into an often overcrowded bus.

Compare that with the estimated $1.7-billion project being considered by Metro and Los Angeles World Airports. Travelers would arrive at the new 96th Street and Aviation Boulevard station and connect to the people-mover, which would whisk them between the terminals, a transportation hub and rental car facilities. The agencies estimate it would take about four minutes to walk from the rail station to the people-mover and five minutes to walk from the people-mover to the terminals. That's significantly less schlepping than is currently required at LAX.

The real test of this collaboration lies ahead, as LAWA finalizes plans for the people-mover and Metro develops its station. Both must make efficiency and traveler convenience a priority. That means designing a rail station that is safe and inviting and gives clear direction to travelers. The people-mover has to provide frequent service and easy access to terminals. If Metro and the airport can design a connection with minimal stairs, luggage hauling and transfers, that would go a long way toward finally fixing the mistakes of the past.

Copyright © 2015, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
  • Building a better transit option to LAX

    Building a better transit option to LAX

    Building a light-rail line directly into LAX would be expensive and would pose security risks, yet that hasn’t stopped advocates from keeping the idea alive.

  • The return of the bloviator

    The return of the bloviator

    As Donald Trump surges, so does "bloviate." "The bloviating billionaire" — it's clearly an alliteration whose time has come. But there's hardly a candidate or commentator who hasn't been labeled with the word. Thirty years ago it was dated slang; now it's seen as the prevailing vice of our public...

  • Doesn't the 1st Amendment apply outside the Supreme Court?

    Doesn't the 1st Amendment apply outside the Supreme Court?

    From race relations to abortion to gay marriage, the Supreme Court plays a crucial role in American life. So it's understandable that activists want to demonstrate on the grand plaza in front of the court's building. Such a majestic backdrop lends force to a protest and increases the possibility...

  • No to the Iran deal means no to U.S. credibility

    No to the Iran deal means no to U.S. credibility

    A striking feature of the debate raging among American politicians over the Iran nuclear agreement is the virtual absence of references to international law. Republican presidential candidates compete as to who among them, if elected president, would be quickest to renounce the agreement, as if...

  • How our healthcare system can be deadly to the elderly

    How our healthcare system can be deadly to the elderly

    The nation's healthcare system is endangering the elderly. But few outside the geriatric medical community seem to notice.

  • Los Angeles could use more COIN

    Los Angeles could use more COIN

    Last month, when Mayor Eric Garcetti and City Council President Herb Wesson announced a tentative contract with unions representing more than half of the city's civilian workforce, budget watchdogs clamored for details so they could analyze the potential financial impact. They're still waiting,...

  • Too many 'ifs' in L.A.'s Olympic projections

    Too many 'ifs' in L.A.'s Olympic projections

    Questions about the financial assumptions in Los Angeles' proposal to host the 2024 Olympic Games are starting to add up. Or, rather, not add up.

  • Back to school, again and again

    Back to school, again and again

    Even in places that remain in touch with the rhythms of agriculture, few seasonal markers prove as heady, reliable and poignant as the reopening of school. Every September the crosswalks ripen with kids in their back-to-school clothes; the long yellow buses harvest our lanes and streets. First...

Comments
Loading
72°