Opinion
Reading Los Angeles: Join The Times' new book club
Opinion Editorial
Editorial

Supervisors, approve Santa Monica Mountains plan

Santa Monica Mountains Local Coastal Program, up for final county approval, deserves passage
It took decades of work by hundreds of people to reach a compromise on Santa Monica Mountains land

Los Angeles County Supervisors have an opportunity to make history next week. Before them will be a motion to grant final approval to the Santa Monica Mountains Local Coastal Program, a painstakingly negotiated and carefully balanced plan that would protect the area and guide future development. The supervisors should approve it with gusto.

The plan is the result of decades of work by hundreds of people — residents of the area, environmentalists, equestrians, vintners and representatives of various government agencies — led by Supervisor Zev Yaroslavsky, whose district includes the mountains above Malibu. Yaroslavsky's patient commitment to the process has produced an extraordinarily broad consensus in support of the plan. Of the nearly 500 letters received by the California Coastal Commission regarding the proposal, fewer than 70 opposed it. That's especially remarkable because of the document's scope: It sets out development rules for an area that covers more than 80 square miles and includes nearly 8,000 separate parcels.

All sides have had to make some concessions to reach the compromise now before the supervisors, but all sides also have achieved their principal objectives. If it passes, environmentalists would secure thousands of acres of protected habitat and safeguards for the area's water quality; homeowners would have the certainty of building rules and would, in the future, take their permitting requests to the county instead of the Coastal Commission. That is expected to produce clearer, faster decisions while remaining faithful to the commission's high standard for coastal protection. Vintners would be able to keep their operations, and people with horses would be required to obey reasonable rules for protecting the environment and, in cases in which they need to make improvements, would be given time to do so.

There are still pockets of opposition. Some vintners, for instance, object to a proposed ban on new vineyards and to the suggestion that their business is environmentally hazardous.

But no existing vineyard would be closed by the plan, and those complaints, hashed out years ago, should not derail the package, which already has received preliminary approval from the supervisors and which the Coastal Commission unanimously approved in April.

The supervisors' vote next week is the last stop in the long and often contentious debate over some of Southern California's most stunning land. If the board approves it, broad swaths of oak groves, canyons and ridgelines will be given the shelter of this important document. That would represent a fitting tribute to Yaroslavsky's diligence; more importantly, it would create a lasting natural resource for generations of Californians to enjoy.

Follow the Opinion section on Twitter @latimesopinion

Copyright © 2015, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
  • Mia Lehrer on what makes a successful park, and how L.A. can build them
    Mia Lehrer on what makes a successful park, and how L.A. can build them

    Landscape architect Mia Lehrer has designed some lavish private gardens in Los Angeles, but she has also made her mark with "guerrilla planning," creating and blue-skying plans for parks and public spaces, from the harbor to Silver Lake. She's Salvadoran by birth, and alert to analyzing how open-space...

  • Taking on Islamic State, with or without Congress
    Taking on Islamic State, with or without Congress

    When he greeted Iraqi Prime Minister Haider Abadi at the White House last week, President Obama said that the Iraqis and their allies, including the United States, had made "serious progress" in pushing Islamic State out of Iraqi territory. That's true, but the enemy is far from vanquished either...

  • What's so hard about calling a genocide a genocide?
    What's so hard about calling a genocide a genocide?

    What two-word phrase is so fraught with history and undeniable truth that the leader of the most powerful nation on Earth dares not use it?

  • A credible threat to California's transgender bathroom law
    A credible threat to California's transgender bathroom law

    In late 2013, the group Privacy For All tried to repeal a new California law allowing transgender students to use the bathroom facilities and play on sports teams of the gender with which they identify. Happily, it failed.

  • Tide of migrants in Mediterranean is the world's problem
    Tide of migrants in Mediterranean is the world's problem

    A tide of death is surging on the Mediterranean Sea, last year the world's most lethal migrant zone. Those waters swallowed 3,279 lives in 2014, a number we may one day consider small, if current trends continue.

  • No more tiers? San Juan Capistrano ruling need not end structured water rates
    No more tiers? San Juan Capistrano ruling need not end structured water rates

    Monday's state appeals court ruling striking down one city’s tiered water rates could, in a worst-case scenario, mean the eventual collapse of all similar rate structures in California, and with them the collapse of the most proven and effective way of getting people to conserve water through the...

  • Vote, and win $25,000: It's a losing idea
    Vote, and win $25,000: It's a losing idea

    Frustrated by the appallingly low turnout in local elections, the nonprofit Southwest Voter Registration Education Project is planning a cash lottery — or voteria — to get voters to the polls for the Los Angeles Board of Education District 5 race. Anyone who legitimately casts a ballot in the May...

  • Fast-track makes sense
    Fast-track makes sense

    As U.S. negotiators try to wrap up a major trade deal with 11 other countries bordering the Pacific Ocean, they find themselves in a Catch-22: Their trading partners say they won't conclude a deal unless Congress agrees to approve or reject it promptly without amendments, but many lawmakers want...

Comments
Loading