Opinion Readers React
Readers React

Senators should take Snowden's lead, shine light on NSA

Former federal government contract worker Edward Snowden's disclosures of virtually limitless surveillance of American citizens by the National Security Agency corroborated the late Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis' wisdom that sunshine is said to be the best of disinfectants. ("Ron Wyden, Mark Udall and Rand Paul: How to end the NSA dragnet," Op-Ed, June 16)

Snowden's revelations generated public outrage among a commanding majority of voters, which forced President Obama to curtail the NSA's surveillance and provoked remedial legislation in Congress championed by Sens. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), Mark Udall (D-Colo.) and Rand Paul (R-Ky.). The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence should be aggressive in publicly disclosing classified information in the public interest, as authorized by its own rules and the Constitution's speech or debate clause, to deter or correct NSA surveillance abuses.

The Supreme Court decision in Gravel vs. United States (1972) provides senators with an absolute constitutional shield from executive retaliation for disclosures made in the course of their legislative duties.

Bruce Fein, Washington

The writer, an associate deputy attorney general under President Reagan, was counsel to Edward Snowden's father.

It is encouraging to read of the NSA reforms put forth by three prominent senators. However, the fundamental issue is the ability of successive administrations to choose what they want hidden from view.

I propose making secrecy public, its parameters posted for all to see.

Some matters and functions of our government should, of course, remain secret; for example, the negotiating positions of those interacting with their foreign counterparts, and the workings of the CIA.

But we need to move toward a public standard for secrecy; in an open society, what is kept secret must be agreed on, not imposed.

Denton Porter, Long Beach

Copyright © 2015, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
  • Ron Wyden, Mark Udall and Rand Paul: How to end the NSA dragnet
    Ron Wyden, Mark Udall and Rand Paul: How to end the NSA dragnet

    One year ago this month, Americans learned that their government was engaged in secret dragnet surveillance, which contradicted years of assurances to the contrary from senior government officials and intelligence leaders.

  • Vaccine skeptics are in denial
    Vaccine skeptics are in denial

    To the editor: My child is a student at Waldorf School of Orange County, and it's unbelievable that 41% of kindergartners started the school year unvaccinated. Just recently a Waldorf parent told me that no one is talking about the measles epidemic — not one conversation. ("Once easily...

  • If judges can't join the Boy Scouts, what about the Mormon Church?

    To the editor: California's Supreme Court unanimously decreed that state judges will no longer be allowed to affiliate with the Boy Scouts of America because of the organization's discrimination against gay and lesbian adults in leadership roles. ("State high court's vote affecting Scout...

  • On civil rights, give religion credit where credit is due

    To the editor: Michael Shermer is wrong to say that "the abolitionist movement was primarily inspired by such secular documents as the American Declaration of Independence and the French Declaration of the Rights of Man." ("The influence of science and reason on moral progress," Op-Ed, Jan. 26)

  • Even a limited nuclear war would devastate the planet

    To the editor: The public health threat of nuclear weapons finds man paralyzed. Yet unlike a deer in headlights, man's large forebrain allows for critical thinking and responsive adaptation. Humans do have the capacity to change. ("Stubborn like a musk ox -- why Homo sapiens can't think...

  • In police-involved shootings, facts are victims

    To the editor: Your editorial is balanced and thoughtful. Not every officer-involved shooting is justified, nor is every one unjustified. ("How to ensure impartial investigations of officers' deadly force?," Editorial, Jan. 26)

  • Are sick kids enough to persuade vaccine-skeptical parents?
    Are sick kids enough to persuade vaccine-skeptical parents?

    To the editor: Any parents not vaccinating their children should be forced to watch a video of an infant with pertussis struggling to breathe and cough. There are several on the Internet, and they are heartbreaking. ("Parents who oppose measles vaccine hold firm to their beliefs," Jan. 25)

  • Obama's action a good start at preserving Alaska's ANWR

    To the editor: I have been to Alaska only once, but after visiting, I am anxious to see more and in greater depth. It is extraordinary and awe inspiring; there is nothing like it, and unless we take the steps President Obama outlined to ban oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge,...

Comments
Loading