Opinion Top of the Ticket

Obama and Romney try to hide their presidential debate skills

The expectations game that has been going on before tonight’s presidential debate between Barack Obama and Mitt Romney has been hilariously goofy. It is as if each side is trying to pretend their guy just wandered in from a life of solitude in a monastery where talking is not allowed. 

President Obama, at his best, is one of the most eloquent speakers ever to take up the big chair in the Oval Office. He may not be a stellar debater, but he held his own with Hillary Rodham Clinton in the 2004 Democratic primary debates and easily outshone Sen. John McCain in the fall trio of face-to-face encounters. And despite the right wing blogosphere’s weird insistence that he cannot utter a coherent sentence without the aid of a teleprompter, Obama is far more articulate in unscripted situations than the last three Republican presidents.

For his part, Mitt Romney has a long debating history, starting with his failed Senate run against Ted Kennedy, his successful race for governor of Massachusetts and two runs for the Republican presidential nomination. After watching every debate of Romney’s career, Atlantic magazine’s James Fallows concluded that Romney is a very tough debater, as long as he is not forced to stray too far from well-rehearsed lines.

Despite their strong credentials, both the candidates and their surrogates have been trying to drive down expectations. Romney’s running mate, Paul D. Ryan, argued that while Obama “has done this before,” this is Romney's “first time on this kind of stage.” Well, not really, Paul, but nice try. Meanwhile, ex-Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm, an Obama supporter, said, “The president is going to lose the first debate. He’s not a great debater.”

In reality, both men can be expected to handily respond to any questions that are thrown at them. But it is not their words that count as much as the image they project on TV. We know that Richard Nixon’s sweaty upper lip and lack of makeup did him no good when he stood next to a suntanned John F. Kennedy in 1960. George H.W. Bush’s glance at his watch during his debate with Bill Clinton in 1992 made him appear too anxious to exit the stage. Al Gore’s audible sighing as George W. Bush spoke annoyed voters in 2000.

So, what will it be this time? Will a sarcastic Obama smirk betray too much arrogance? Will a nervous Romney shuffle combined with a couple of awkward eye blinks come off as befuddlement? Will the expectations game before the debate and the spin room analysis afterward prove as important as whatever the candidates do on stage? We will see.

The pressure is on. One errant sigh, one drop of sweat, one garbled thought have sunk candidacies in past debates. In truth, it is that single killer mistake we will all be watching for as the debates begin.

ALSO:

Yanukovych: PR firms and nice suits hide authoritarian intentions

Americans can learn something from Ukraine's struggle for liberty

Republicans have a medieval mindset about climate change

Copyright © 2014, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
  • Americans can learn something from Ukraine's struggle for liberty
    Americans can learn something from Ukraine's struggle for liberty

    KIEV, Ukraine -- Making a brief escape to this heartland of the old Soviet Union, I find myself more inspired by the people's striving for liberty here than by the petty nastiness of the American presidential campaign. For over a year, Republican candidates and tea party activists have been...

  • Republicans have a medieval mindset about climate change
    Republicans have a medieval mindset about climate change

    AMSTERDAM -- On an early morning flight coming out of the clouds above the North Sea, the first objects that come into view as the coast of the Netherlands approaches are the windmills. No, not the quaint, creaking, wooden windmills that, along with wooden shoes and the little boy with his...

  • Obama's fourth-quarter foreign policy surprises
    Obama's fourth-quarter foreign policy surprises

    Six months ago, President Obama's foreign policy looked stymied. Negotiations with Israel and the Palestinians were at a dead end. Russia was gaining ground in eastern Ukraine. U.S. efforts to end the war in Syria were ineffective. A new extremist army, Islamic State, was marching into Iraq.

  • Ukraine should put Russia to the test
    Ukraine should put Russia to the test

    Ukraine is now strong enough to seize the initiative to create a lasting cease-fire in its Donbas Rust Belt, currently occupied by Russia and its proxies. And Russia may be weak enough to be receptive. It is in Kiev's interest to do so. A state of permanent war with Russia would damage...

  • The great fear of the great outdoors
    The great fear of the great outdoors

    Americans find ourselves in a period — arguably, the first in our nation's history — when our unease about being in nature is coming to outweigh our desire for it. We have a growing intolerance for inconvenience, a feeling well captured by the suburban fifth-grader who memorably...

  • Animals and humans sometimes kill their young -- the question is why
    Animals and humans sometimes kill their young -- the question is why

    Among the endless stream of bad news in the media, every now and then something occurs that it is so horrendous that it stops us in our tracks. That has happened once again with Tuesday's massacre at a school in Peshawar, Pakistan. Among the victims: 132 children who died — many of them...

Comments
Loading