California campaigns swamped with independent spending


This article was originally on a blog post platform and may be missing photos, graphics or links. See About archive blog posts.

Independent spending on California elections has soared by 1,600% in the last decade, according to a new analysis from California Common Sense, a nonpartisan research group at Stanford University.

California Common Sense reviewed data from 2000 through May, and it billed the report as the most comprehensive study of its kind. Research director Mike Polyakov said it is ‘troubling’ how difficult it is to track campaign spending with the secretary of state’s online database, known as Cal-Access.


“Correcting for its inaccuracies and the poor organization of its interface, we sought to provide this useful information to all Californians,” he said in a statement.

Independent expenditures are different from campaign donations. Since voters limited direct contributions in 2000 with Proposition 34, big donors and other special interests have increasingly used separate committees to spend money on behalf of candidates.

‘Independent spending -– unhampered by limits -– can potentially be more influential than direct contributions,’ said the California Common Sense report.

Unions and their campaign committees were the biggest players, accounting for $90 million of independent spending in the last decade, the report said. Businesses and related groups gave $27.7 million.


Poll finds voters split on Proposition 32

Arizona political group dumps $11 million into California races

Labor’s big-money focus on Prop. 32 may hurt chances of Prop. 30

-- Chris Megerian in Sacramento