Deeming Rupert Murdoch not ‘fit’ opens a partisan divide
This article was originally on a blog post platform and may be missing photos, graphics or links. See About archive blog posts.
LONDON -- It’s the most explosive line in the report, and the line that some lawmakers said they could not cross.
The finding that Rupert Murdoch is “not a fit person” to head a major international company led the news here in Britain following the release of a report Tuesday by a parliamentary committee looking into the phone-hacking scandal at Murdoch’s giant News Corp.
But that one line, an extraordinary personal criticism of the Australia-born media magnate, turned the report into something of a political football, dividing the committee along party lines and preventing the panel’s full endorsement of the lengthy report.
The committee unanimously agreed that three of News Corp.’s senior executives essentially lied to lawmakers about the extent of hacking at the News of the World tabloid. Instead of being the work of a lone reporter, intercepting private voicemails now seems to have been practiced on an almost industrial scale at the newspaper, which Murdoch closed down last summer.
Murdoch and his son James both showed an “astonishing” lack of interest or will to get to the bottom of the affair, the report said.
But to then make a judgment as to Rupert Murdoch’s fitness to run News Corp. “was wildly outside the scope” of the committee’s purview, said Louise Mensch, one of the five Conservative Party lawmakers on the panel.
She castigated the Labor and Liberal Democrat members of the committee for sacrificing unanimity by insisting on inclusion of that line. In the end, Mensch and three fellow Conservatives withheld their support of the report in a 6-4 vote. (The fifth Conservative, the committee’s chairman, did not cast a vote.)
“It will be correctly seen as a partisan report, and will have lost a very great deal of its credibility, which is an enormous shame,” Mensch told reporters.
Although both the Conservative and Labor parties have cozied up to News Corp. and sought the favor of its British newspapers, the Conservatives are more identified with Murdoch in the popular mind.
Tom Watson, the Labor lawmaker who has been one of the fiercest critics of News Corp., defended the report’s scathing criticism of Murdoch.
“More than any individual alive, he is to blame. Morally the deeds are his. He paid the piper, and he called the tune,” said Watson, who once compared News Corp. to the Mafia.
Analysts say that the slam on Murdoch seemed clearly aimed at influencing Britain’s media regulator, Ofcom. The agency is charged with determining whether News Corp., which has a controlling 39% stake in British Sky Broadcasting, is a “fit and proper” holder of a broadcast license in Britain. A negative judgment by Ofcom would be a major blow to Murdoch.
An Ofcom spokesman, speaking on customary condition of anonymity, said that the agency was reading the report “with interest.”
Rupert Murdoch apologizes, again
Rupert Murdoch sorry about phone hacking but is also defiant
Murdoch son tells of contacts with British officials on BSkyB bid
-- Henry Chu