Advertisement

Crowding Cures Ignore Learning, Parents Fear

Share
Times Staff Writer

Parents meeting with top Los Angeles Unified School District officials charged Monday that the district is more interested in supplying seats than offering a quality education.

The complaints came during a 2 1/2-hour meeting at district offices in Panorama City to discuss several proposals to alleviate classroom crowding, including a plan to place all of the system’s schools on a year-round schedule.

Many of the representatives of parent-teacher organizations from schools north of Roscoe Boulevard grumbled that the district’s proposals were confusing. They also said the proposals’ effect on a school’s curriculum did not appear to have been well thought out and argued that changes in the number of credits given for high-school classes could lead to colleges’ not accepting high-school course work.

Advertisement

134,000 More Seats

Under the district’s proposal, 134,000 seats could be created if the system adopted a far-reaching plan that includes a year-round calender. The recommendations include plans for the reopening of some closed West San Fernando Valley schools, increasing class sizes at racially isolated schools--which now have smaller classes than integrated ones--and, if the courts agree, increasing the number of minority students at an already integrated school.

There are now two versions of a year-round calendar under consideration. One is a five-term school year in which students would attend for four 45-day quarters, then have a 45-day vacation. This proposal would increase each school’s capacity by 25%, district officials said.

The second is a four-term school year, under which students would attend for four 60-day quarters and have one 60-day vacation. This plan would allow each school to expand its enrollment by 33%.

Although many of the parents at Monday’s meeting acknowledged that the district is nearing a crisis in classroom space, they accused school officials of making increased capacity their top priority.

“The emphasis seems to be on seats available, not a good education program,” Joanne Jarrett, a PTA member from Grant High School in Van Nuys, said of the year-round proposal.

Sheila Lane of the North Hollywood High School PTA said she worries about how colleges will be able to compare a student’s grades from a four-quarter system, in which each class is worth 2 1/2 credits, with those of students who attend traditional two-semester schools, where classes are each worth five credits.

Advertisement

But Santiago Jackson, head of the school utilization division, countered by saying that a year-round calender would not hurt the academic program and would help students who need to repeat courses.

Barry Mostovoy of the district’s school operations section added that a year-round schedule with courses worth only 2 1/2 credits would allow students to enroll in elective courses they might not get in the traditional two-semester system.

Advertisement