Advertisement

Proposed Use of Scout Camp Draws Protests

Share
Times Staff Writer

Where the asphalt on Red Rock Road, in western Topanga, gives way to a bumpy stretch of dirt, county maintenance ends. The dirt section stops abruptly at a white picket fence, where a sign announces the boundary of the state-owned Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy land. This is the entrance to an old Boy Scout camp that is now Red Rock Canyon Park.

The dirt road leading to the park, and a stretch of fire road inside the park, are on private property. The two roads are at the center of a disagreement over the conservancy’s attempts to increase the level of recreational activity at the 120-acre site, purchased last year from the Scouts for $250,000.

The neighbors say they support the conservancy’s plan to allow the Outward Bound organization to operate a survival-skills school and a reservation-only campground open to the public. However, the Scouts did not use the camp much in recent years and the property owners worry that an influx of traffic on their narrow, winding road could endanger drivers and residents, and alter the peaceful character of their isolated community.

Advertisement

And, although negotiations are friendly at this point, the residents contend that they can influence the outcome by limiting the use of their road.

The dispute is the second time this year that neighbors of a little-used Scout camp have protested the conservancy’s efforts to bring in more visitors, and the second time they have used their control of access to the grounds as leverage.

In April, a neighbor of Camp Josepho in Rustic Canyon near Pacific Palisades warned that his 900-foot stretch of the road leading to the camp is not for general use. Another neighbor used her car to block a bus carrying passengers to a ceremony marking the opening of the camp to the public. The camp is still owned by the Western Los Angeles County Council of the Scouts, but the site was to be made available to outside groups on a reservation-only basis as a condition of the conservancy’s financing of $250,000 worth of repairs.

At Red Rock, the discussion has been more low-key. In both cases, the neighbors are self-described environmentalists who say they are uncomfortable battling a parks agency. Both cases raise questions about which locations are suitable for public use--and public funds--in the rugged hills where state and federal officials are assembling a network of mountain parks.

“Not every place can have as much public access as we’d like,” said Joseph T. Edmiston, the conservancy’s executive director. “You have to think really hard about who gets in and who doesn’t, because otherwise the geography will defeat you.”

Without the existing facilities at the two sites, Edmiston said, the conservancy would never have spent half a million dollars there. ‘Were it not for the fact that there is a developed camp at Red Rock Canyon, and its rock formations are so pretty, we wouldn’t have bought it,” Edmiston said.

Advertisement

“Likewise, if Camp Josepho hadn’t already been there, we wouldn’t have spent the money to fix it up.”

In the face of public desire to use parks and pressure from those nearby to restrict their use, “a lot of people would say, ‘Screw the neighbors’ or say, ‘It’s not worth the hassle; we’ll just close it off,’ ” Edmiston said. “There’s been too much of that thinking in the mountains already.”

Ignoring the neighbors would not be fair and could lead to trouble, he said, but closing off the parks could mean that a generally affluent community gets near-exclusive use of a state-funded expanse of land.

Outward Bound was selected to operate Red Rock Canyon Park in an attempt to compromise, Edmiston said. The organization plans to limit use of the camp’s 120 acres to 50 people at a time, and to shuttle participants in vans to minimize traffic.

The conservancy board unanimously voted last week to award a 15-year lease to Outward Bound.

“It’s a restriction,” said Edmiston, “but Outward Bound has an outreach program, awarding scholarships. They try to aim their programs at youth at risk (disadvantaged urban dwellers), so at least they’re opening up the parks to those who need them.”

Advertisement

Sandra Blakeslee , a six-year Red Rock Road resident, says the concept is fine. “We’re very spoiled,” she said. “But we want public access. It’s not like we want this to be a private thing that just the residents use. Right now, hikers come in and equestrians come in. And we think Outward Bound is wonderful.”

But, she added, “our concern is that eight years down the road, nine years, 10 years . . . they’ll have all new people in. They could triple the program. Our position is that right now we have some rights and we should sort this out at the very beginning.”

The residents realize that it could be argued in court that the Scouts have established a tradition of using the road and that outsiders should continue to have access. “At this point,” Blakeslee said, “we think they have the right to use this road as much as the Scouts did, which was not very much. The Scouts used the road from October to May on weekends and holidays.”

Children and dogs play on the dirt street, which is filled with blind curves, she said. The Red Rock Road neighbors “are not going to slam a gate up. We would never do that,” Blakeslee said. However, she said, “I suppose if they were really obnoxious, we could just fold our arms and let them fix it,” the next time the road washes out.

Alex von Wetter, another property owner, suggested that the conservancy use another entrance to the park--a fire road that leads from Stunt Road to the grounds. “That way, they come in over a hill and don’t see another house,” he said. “They’re going to have a wilderness experience. They’re not going through everybody’s backyard.”

But a portion of that fire road is part of a 10-acre parcel belonging to Carmen Ranalli , who has placed a gate, a sawhorse and “No Trespassing” signs on his stretch of the path.

Advertisement

Ranalli’s attorney, Shane A. Carlson, said, “It’s no reflection on the people who want to use the property. Carmen loves the Scouts and the outdoors. But he is a citizen just like the rest of us and he should have rights just like everybody else.”

The conservancy has asked the state attorney general’s office to research the access rights for both Red Rock Canyon and Josepho. Conservancy attorney Ann Rushton said she expects the information in several weeks.

Meanwhile, the Scouts are not required to let outsiders use Josepho, Edmiston said. The angry residents there, however, are not mollified. “I’m very far from pleased and I’m very far from finished,” said neighbor Arlene Fink. “We’re still vitally interested in finding out what happens to that road.”

Advertisement