Advertisement

U.S. Soccer Federation Will Resume Its Quest for the 1994 World Cup

Share via
Times Staff Writer

Unable since 1950 to go to soccer’s World Cup, the United States has changed its tactics. It now is attempting to bring the World Cup to the United States.

If the U.S. Soccer Federation (USSF) is successful in its bid for the 1994 World Cup, soccer insiders speculate that the semifinals would be played in the Coliseum and the Rose Bowl, with the final in the Rose Bowl.

But the USSF first must convince the executive committee of the Federation Internationale de Football Associations (FIFA) to award the World Cup to the United States. Unlike the Olympics, the World Cup is awarded to a country, not a city.

Advertisement

USSF officials will resume their efforts at FIFA headquarters in Zurich, Switzerland, Thursday, when they make their second presentation at a reception for the 22-member executive committee.

On Saturday, the executive committee will preside over the draw for the 1990 World Cup, which has been awarded to Italy. Of 112 countries that will begin regional qualifications next year, 22 will earn berths in Italy.

Thom Meredith, a USSF spokesman, said this presentation will be more informal than the first, which was made in September and included a 481-page technical document.

Advertisement

The highlight of this presentation, Meredith said, will be the videotape of a recent White House meeting between President Reagan and FIFA President Joao Havelange of Brazil. In the soccer world, that was the real superpower summit.

Also expected to make presentations this week are representatives from the other two candidates, Brazil and Morocco. Chile recently withdrew its bid for financial reasons.

The executive committee will select the host country at a June 30 meeting in Zurich.

Between now and then, a FIFA site selection committee will visit the three countries. The committee is scheduled to come to the United States in late March or early April, when it will tour 18 stadiums that the USSF has selected. If the United States wins the bid, the USSF will designate 12 of the stadiums for use in the 3-week, 52-match tournament.

Advertisement

USSF officials say that it is premature to predict which stadiums would be selected for the semifinals and the final, but it is no secret that FIFA was impressed with the Rose Bowl as a soccer venue during the 1984 Summer Olympics.

More people attended soccer than any other sport during the Olympics. That included the three largest crowds ever to see the sport in the United States, all at the Rose Bowl. There were 101,799 for the final, 100,374 for the semifinals and 97,451 for a preliminary game between France and Yugoslavia.

With a few modifications, the Rose Bowl and the Coliseum would meet FIFA standards, which includes a capacity of 30,000 to 40,000 for preliminary matches and 60,000 to 80,000 for the semifinals and the final, a 115 x 75-yard field and natural grass.

“You need two stadiums in the same general area for the semifinals, and then you choose one for the final,” said Scott LeTellier, a member of the Los Angeles Chamber of Commerce Sports Council’s World Cup subcommittee. “For one of the first times in history, the Rose Bowl and the Coliseum are working together on this.

“Ideally, both of them would be used for the semifinals. Then, on the dead night between the semifinals and final, a concert would be held in the stadium that isn’t being used for the final. In Madrid (in 1982), they had a Rolling Stones concert in one of the stadiums the night before the final. I can see stadium management saying, ‘Forget the final; give us the concert.’ ”

South Florida also is campaigning for the semifinals and final. The USSF has selected four stadiums from that region, including the Orange Bowl in Miami, Joe Robbie Stadium in Fort Lauderdale, Tampa Stadium in Tampa Bay and the Citrus Bowl in Orlando.

Advertisement

Robbie, owner of the Fort Lauderdale Strikers in the now-defunct North American Soccer League, had Robbie Stadium constructed so that it could be converted for World Cup play.

“One advantage the Rose Bowl has is that it seats more than 100,000, while Robbie Stadium seats 75,000,” LeTellier said. “Those 25,000 extra seats might make a difference to FIFA when tickets for the final are going for triple figures.”

Danny Villanueva, chairman of the Sports Council’s subcommittee, said that areas within the United States should not compete with each other until the bid is won.

“First, we have to get it in the United States,” he said.

Speculation in the European and South American press is that the USSF would have to make significant mistakes between now and June to lose. To assure that does not happen, the USSF has hired Eddie Mahe Jr. and Associates, Washington political consultants, to orchestrate the campaign. They arranged the Reagan-Havelange meeting, in which the President, trying to win another for the Gipper, told a story involving Knute Rockne and soccer.

Traditionally, the World Cup alternates between Europe and the Americas. As the 1990 World Cup will be in Italy, it is the Americas’ turn in 1994.

Of the 22 executive board members, 8 are Europeans, while 4 are South Americans. The United States is believed to have the Europeans’ support because they presumably would rather have their teams play here than in Brazil. With only two stadiums that seat more than 40,000, Morocco is not considered a serious contender.

Advertisement

“Never has a European team won the World Cup in South America,” LeTellier said. “A South American team has won only one World Cup in Europe. If there is a choice between playing the final in Brazil or in the Rose Bowl, which do you think the Europeans would select? The Rose Bowl would be like a neutral site.”

That assumes that the U.S. team would not be a contender, which is about as safe as assuming that Puerto Rico will not be a power in skiing by then. The United States has failed to advance through the regional qualifying and into the 22-team World Cup nine straight times.

As the host country, the United States would automatically earn a berth in the 1994 World Cup, which, Villanueva said, is another reason FIFA would like to have the tournament here.

He said that FIFA officials believe that if the United States becomes competitive in soccer, the sport has a chance to become as popular here as in other parts of the world.

As a result, he said, FIFA might eventually be able to generate the revenues from American television and marketing that the International Olympic Committee does. While ABC paid $225 million for the rights to the 1984 Summer Olympics in Los Angeles, NBC bought the rights to the 1986 World Cup in Mexico for $5 million.

“FIFA has almost as many countries as the Olympic movement, but it’s been a tough, tough sale in the United States,” Villanueva said. “As some wags say, soccer is the sport of the future here and always will be.”

Advertisement

LeTellier said he does not believe the World Cup would be a tough sale in the United States.

“We may be blase about events that don’t have major status, but you don’t have to worry about that with the World Cup,” he said. “To some people, the World Cup is the biggest event in the world, even bigger than the Olympics. I think a lot of people in the United States will come out to see what it’s all about.”

One concern that FIFA has, Villanueva said, is whether people in the United States would continue to follow soccer after the World Cup.

“They don’t want it to be a one-night stand,” he said. “There’s a lot of trepidation that they might be here today and gone tomorrow. That’s why it’s important to them that the USSF develops a plan to ensure that the World Cup leaves a legacy in the United States.”

Another factor that could work against the United States is that Havelange is from Brazil. While he has declared his neutrality, it is believed that some executive committee members might vote for Brazil as a gesture of their support for him.

There is, however, a financial crisis in Brazil that other executive committee members fear would prevent that country from refurbishing its stadiums in time for the 1994 World Cup.

Advertisement

The United States also has its angles. The executive committee member from Saudi Arabia was working toward a post-graduate degree at Michigan State the year the Spartans won the National Collegiate Athletic Assn. basketball championship.

“If he comes to Los Angeles, we’ll have him shake hands with Magic Johnson,” LeTellier said.

Proposed Stadium Sites

Of the 18 stadiums the United States Soccer Federation has proposed as potential sites for World Cup matches, 12 in 4 regions would be selected if the United States wins the bid. The 18 proposed stadiums are:

West Rose Bowl, 103,553; Coliseum, 92,516; Husky Stadium, Seattle, 72,484; Parker Stadium, Corvallis, Ore., 40,593; Silver Bowl, Las Vegas, 30,000.

Northeast JFK Stadium, Philadelphia, 90,000; Franklin Field, Philadelphia, 61,000; RFK Stadium, Washington, 55,000; Palmer Stadium, Princeton, N.J., 45,000; Navy-Marine Corps Memorial Stadium, Annapolis, Md., 40,000.

Southeast Orange Bowl, Miami, 75,355; Joe Robbie Stadium, Fort Lauderdale, Fla., 74,990; Tampa Stadium, Tampa, Fla., 74,317; Citrus Bowl, Orlando, Fla., 50,843.

Advertisement

Midwest Arrowhead Stadium, Kansas City, 78,065; Cotton Bowl, Dallas, 72,000; Soldier Field, Chicago, 66,260; Minnesota Sports Stadium*, Blaine, Minn., proposed 1994 capacity 90,000.

*--under construction.

Advertisement