President Urged to Meet Press More Frequently

A commission of journalists and academics called Wednesday for reviving the presidential press conference and making it a “frequent, routine and undramatic” institution.

“The longer presidents go without a press conference, the greater the suspicion that there is something to hide, and the greater the pressure becomes for holding press conferences,” the panel said.

“When, ultimately, the President holds a conference, it is liable to be a hostile affair in which both the President and the press look bad. It would seem better, on balance, for the President to take his lumps on a more frequent basis,” it said.

‘Media Must Mend Ways’

At the same time, the Harvard Commission on the Presidential News Conference said, the media must mend their ways if the press conference is to revive. The public will not lend its attention to the sessions if it believes that reporters’ questions are unfair, irrelevant or overly aggressive, it concluded.

The 16-member commission, appointed by the Joan Shorenstein Barone Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy of Harvard University’s John F. Kennedy School of Government, studied the issue for a year. It was co-chaired by former newscaster Marvin Kalb, director of the center, and Frederick W. Mayer, assistant professor of public policy at Duke University.

The commission said the presidential press conference, a 75-year-old institution, “is not aging well” and that under Ronald Reagan it has fallen into “a serious state of disrepair.”

Reagan has held 45 formal news conferences in his nearly eight years in office, and once went 5 1/2 months without a formal meeting with reporters. President Franklin D. Roosevelt met with reporters nearly 1,000 times in 13 years.