Use of Special Prosecutor

The Los Angeles Times has significant influence in our community. I was, therefore, very surprised and disappointed when, in its editorial “Not Yet Enough” (May 12), the editorial board advocated an action which, under the provisions of the city charter, is not only premature, but could even be illegal.

The Times called for the appointment of a “special prosecutor” to investigate the conflict of interest charges involving Mayor Tom Bradley.

Did you take into consideration the fact that the City Council, according to the charter, does not have the authority to appoint or employ a special prosecutor? In fact, even if the council wanted to have outside attorneys, as urged by The Times, we would have to seek prior written approval from the city attorney. Given his public position on this matter, his approval in the matter is very doubtful.

The city attorney has clearly and publicly stated his position; he believes he is capable and intends to fulfill his elected and charter responsibilities with respect to the investigation of the mayor’s business dealings.

We would be remiss if we failed to let the city attorney carry out the responsibilities of the position to which the people of Los Angeles elected him. We should not compromise the investigation before it is complete.

And the media, particularly, should be aware of that fact.

JOHN FERRARO

President

Los Angeles City Council