SCHOOL--BY--SCHOOL EIGHTH--GRADE WRITING ACHIEVEMENT SCORES : Assessment Exams Affect Curriculum, Survey Shows
- Share via
If one of the goals of regular statewide testing is to help shape what goes on in the classroom, then state education officials have reason to be cheered by results of a statewide survey that looks at the newly revised California Assessment Program’s writing exam.
“To show continued success on the CAP writing test, schools must develop a multiyear approach to writing instruction that crosses all grade levels and subject areas,” state Supt. of Public Instruction Bill Honig said when the test results were made public in February. And that is apparently what is happening.
The statewide survey by two college professors showed that the writing exam is having an effect on the English curriculum in junior highs and middle schools.
Profs. Sandra Murphy of San Francisco State University and Charles Cooper of UC San Diego sent their survey to eighth-grade teachers at 600 randomly selected schools, and more than 90% of English teachers responding said the test will strengthen the curriculum at their schools.
The annual test, administered to 308,000 eighth-graders last spring, covers eight types of writing. All essays must be completed in 45 minutes, and each is scored to measure thinking and writing process skills as well as such mechanics of writing as spelling and grammar.
More than 90% of the survey respondents also said they have already changed the way they teach writing because of the test, and 78% said they now make more writing assignments.
Four types of writing--autobiographical incident, evaluation, problem solution and report of information--were introduced when the writing assessment program was launched in 1987. First-hand biography and story were added in 1988, followed last year by the addition of observational writing and speculation about causes or effects.
A writing exam for 12th-graders was begun in the fall of 1988 and will be fully implemented with eight tests this November. State officials are considering whether to add writing tests for sixth-graders and possibly for third-graders.
HOW TO READ THE SCORES
Here are the school-by-school results of the California Assessment Program’s writing exam that was administered to eighth-graders throughout the state last spring.
The exam consists of eight tests of writing ability and represents the state’s biggest step to date away from the much-criticized multiple-choice method of testing academic achievement.
Results are listed by school district and by individual school so that parents can compare the performance of youngsters in their community with that of students in the rest of Los Angeles County and throughout California. (Schools are listed alphabetically by district.)
Because the exam was changed substantially last year with the addition of two more writing tests, only the latest round of scores is listed.
Scaled score is a combination of results on each of the eight separate writing tests. The statewide average score was 255 for eighth-graders, and the average in Los Angeles County was 230.
Relative rank is a way to compare a district or school with another that is similar to it in terms of student ethnic and socioeconomic makeup and students’ ability to speak English fluently, as well as how often those students move from school to school. The value listed is the school’s percentile rank within its comparison group.
State rank shows the school or district’s rank (on a scale of 1 to 99), comparing its scores to scores of every other school or district in the state.
ABC Unified DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 280 74 60
CARMENITA
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 288 77 34
HASKELL
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 283 73 53
KILLINGSWORTH
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 189 9 24
ROSS
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 258 54 45
TETZLAFF
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 291 79 67
WHITNEY
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 439 99 99
Bellflower Unified DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 259 55 44
BELLFLOWER
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 248 44 47
MAYFAIR
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 271 64 40
Compton Unified DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 145 1 2
BUNCHE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 121 1 1
DAVIS
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 146 2 1
ENTERPRISE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 145 1 2
ROOSEVELT
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 144 1 1
VANGUARD
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 167 3 2
WALTON
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 159 3 3
WHALEY
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 133 1 1
WILLOWBROOK
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 155 2 3
Downey Unified DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 260 56 56
EAST
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 272 65 49
GRIFFITHS
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 275 67 61
SOUTH
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 236 34 41
WEST
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 262 57 73
East Whittier City Elementary DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 254 50 37
EAST WHITTIER
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 252 47 54
GRANADA
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 260 56 27
HILLVIEW
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 249 45 27
El Rancho Unified DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 209 17 33
BURKE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 230 29 36
NORTH PARK
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 211 17 49
RIVERA
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 186 9 9
Little Lake City Elementary DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 248 45 57
LAKE CENTER
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 250 45 58
LAKESIDE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 247 43 56
Long Beach Unified DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 232 31 38
BANCROFT
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 266 61 45
DeMILLE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 223 24 23
FRANKLIN
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 202 14 40
HAMILTON
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 203 15 15
HILL
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 237 35 60
HOOVER
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 234 32 38
HUGHES
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 263 59 33
JEFFERSON
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 228 27 41
LINDBERGH
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 204 15 27
MARSHALL
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 224 25 40
NEWCOMB
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 321 92 88
ROGERS
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 254 49 23
STANFORD
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 233 32 51
STEPHENS
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 240 38 37
WASHINGTON
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 172 4 12
Los Angeles Unified DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 202 16 21
GAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 178 7 17
NIMITZ
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 178 7 16
SOUTH GATE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 183 8 20
Los Nietos Elementary DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 221 20 42
LOS NIETOS
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 221 22 42
Lowell Joint Elementary DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 284 76 37
RANCHO-STARBUCK
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 284 74 37
Lynwood Unified DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 186 2 20
HOSLER
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 186 9 20
Montebello Unified DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 224 24 57
BELL GARDENS
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 207 16 45
EASTMONT
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 220 22 59
LA MERCED INTERMEDIATE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 235 33 53
MACY
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 272 65 79
MONTEBELLO
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 217 21 56
SUVA INTERMEDIATE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 211 17 49
Norwalk-La Mirada Unified DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 235 34 39
GLENN HIGH
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 212 18 46
LA MIRADA HIGH
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 246 43 18
NORWALK HIGH
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 245 42 52
Paramount Unified DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 184 2 15
ALONDRA
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 196 11 17
CLEARWATER
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 174 5 14
South Whittier Elementary DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 227 26 67
SOUTH WHITTIER
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 227 27 67
Whittier City Elementary DISTRICT AVERAGE
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 237 37 56
DEXTER
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 237 35 63
EDWARDS
Scaled Relative State Year Score Rank Rank 88-89 237 35 47
More to Read
Sign up for Essential California
The most important California stories and recommendations in your inbox every morning.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.