Fundamental Betrayal of Trust : Drug corruption convictions make the case for tougher deputy supervision

The conviction of seven Los Angeles County Sheriff’s deputies on federal charges stemming from their theft of money seized from drug traffickers and money launderers is an occasion for sober and constructive reflection rather than satisfaction.

Public corruption cases--whether they involve presidents or police officers--are particularly wrenching, since they lay bare not only criminality, but also a fundamental betrayal of trust. Too frequently our natural response to the latter is a retreat into either cynicism or denial. In this instance, neither will suffice, as there is yet much to be endured--and, more important, to be done.

Two more trials arising from the federal indictments, handed down earlier this year, already are scheduled. Another federal grand jury is investigating allegations that other Sheriff’s deputies and an unknown number of Los Angeles Police Department narcotics officers have been involved in stealing money, beatings and the planting of drugs on suspects during raids.

From the moment this affair came to light, three things have been clear: Los Angeles’ complacency in its reputation as America’s “cleanest” urban area is unjustified. This city and county may be “the great exception” in many ways, but we have yet to find a way to suspend human nature.

Spurred by the federal government’s Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984, which allows local law enforcement groups to keep 90% of the drug money they seize, police agencies have been quick to set up special units directed against “major” narcotics dealers. But supervision of the units--never an easy task--has not proven adequate. Sheriff Sherman Block has taken steps to remedy this, but more remains to be done.

Finally, elected officials, like the County Board of Supervisors, have failed in their duty to exercise appropriate oversight of their police agencies.

No drug-war program will work if the police are hooked on corruption.