Controversy Over No-Fault
- Share via
I can’t believe some California politicians have aligned themselves with an insurance industry that is not only stalling the reforms and rebates of Proposition 103 but advocating a no-fault system that was overwhelmingly defeated in 1988.
Consumer advocates Ralph Nader and Harvey Rosenfield are right: No-fault is not the answer to affordable car insurance. No-fault not only compromises our rights but lets drunk drivers who cause accidents off the hook.
No-fault auto insurance means the insurance industry decides if you get paid, when you get paid and how much you get paid. Let’s hope the Legislature can outfox the insurance industry by coming up with an insurance plan that cuts rates, not rights.
THEM K. TRAN
Executive Director
Unified Vietnamese Community Council
Los Angeles
Get the L.A. Times Politics newsletter
Deeply reported insights into legislation, politics and policy from Sacramento, Washington and beyond. In your inbox twice per week.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
