Laid-Off Worker Takes on JPL With Job Bias Suit

TIMES STAFF WRITER

Greg Richard is a driven man.

He sleeps on the floor of his apartment in Los Angeles, lives out of boxes, and has sold almost everything except his fax machine, which whirs with steady missives to members of Congress, other federal officials and anyone else who may be willing to listen to his long tale of woe.

Two years ago, the 33-year-old mechanical engineer was laid off from his job at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory because of what JPL called budget constraints.

Since that time, Richard estimates he has spent hundreds of hours and up to $8,000 fighting JPL, a U.S. government facility with a budget of more than $1 billion operated by Caltech under a contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

Richard's aim: to prove that JPL racially discriminated against him by laying him off in March, 1991. The engineer, who is African-American, filed a $200-million lawsuit last year in Los Angeles federal court, alleging that his layoff was a wrongful termination that violated affirmative action laws.

Last month, Richard's case suffered a setback when U.S. District Judge Lourdes G. Baird, agreeing to a motion by JPL for summary judgment, dismissed four of the five counts, including all the discrimination charges.

The last count, for breach of contract, will be heard Monday and Richard is pinning all his hopes for vindication on that decision. But he realizes that Monday's hearing could also spell his last hurrah. And that thought tortures him.

"They've stripped me of my manhood; my dignity," Richard said angrily. "Emotionally, I've missed out on two years of my life that I can never get back. Everyone else has families, homes, and I have nothing. All because I took a stand against discrimination."

George Alexander, a JPL spokesman, said the lab has no comment on the lawsuit.

"We believe we have a very fair and equitable program for all employees," he added. "With 6,500 employees, there may inevitably be a disgruntled employee. But we await our day in court."

JPL defends its hiring history of minorities. Alexander said JPL has an active recruitment program for all minorities and makes regular visits to job fairs, historically black colleges and other universities with large numbers of minorities.

Between 1980 and 1992, Alexander said, the number of minorities employed as technical professionals, such as engineers and scientists, grew from 330 of 2,000 employees to almost 750 of about 3,000 employees. In that same time period, in professional and administrative categories, minorities climbed from 90 of 600 employees to 160 of 670, Alexander said.

Nonetheless, JPL has faced various discrimination lawsuits from former employees in recent years. In 1991, four technical workers filed a $20-million federal lawsuit against JPL alleging harassment and racial discrimination. The matter has been set for trial later this year. A sexual harassment suit is also pending. JPL recently settled out of court on another discrimination suit filed by a technical manager.

Ironically, JPL in 1991 received an Exemplary Volunteer Efforts Award from the federal government for its innovative efforts to increase the employment opportunities for minorities, women, individuals with disabilities, disabled veterans and Vietnam veterans.

In Richard's case--regardless of whether one considers him a victim of discrimination or a disgruntled ex-employee--his story illustrates the difficulties of taking on a large bureaucracy with ties to the federal government.

After months of waiting, Richard's frustration increased in January when he learned that the judge assigned to his case, U.S. District Court Magistrate Elgin Edwards, had taken himself off the case because he had worked for Caltech-JPL from 1988 to 1991 as a patent attorney.

Edwards took the action before making any judicial rulings on Richard's case. But the angry engineer saw this as one more sign that powerful forces were allied against him.

Richard admits that the two-year legal battle has become an obsession. He spends hours each week digging up new documentation that he hopes will support his arguments. He can quote chapter and verse from federal equal employment guidelines.

His one-bedroom apartment in the Crenshaw District is stacked with five-foot piles of documents. He forcefully and frequently voices his belief about a conspiracy among various federal agencies to protect JPL.

For Richard, this battle has become very personal. His layoff took him from a $37,960-a-year job to the unemployment line. Although he has traveled as far as Texas for 22 job interviews since that time, Richard says nothing has panned out. Now, with his savings running out, the engineer says he is almost homeless and may be forced to move in with his parents.

Richard's lawsuit alleges that JPL's affirmative action program was inadequate and that the firm did too little to hire and promote African-Americans and Latinos, who traditionally have been underrepresented in science and engineering.

Richard was recruited to JPL during a job fair and began working in Quality Assurance Flight Systems in June, 1990. When he completed his probationary period that Oct. 10, Richard's superiors told him they were impressed with his "enthusiasm, assertiveness and eagerness toward his job," according to the lawsuit.

Early the following year, JPL transferred Richard several times in what the lawsuit alleges was retaliation for his insistence that employees follow proper quality assurance procedures.

In March, 1991, the lab laid Richard off, citing budget constraints. Around the same time, the lawsuit alleged, JPL hired three Anglos into the same department. Four months later, JPL began advertising for a contract engineer with Richard's job description to work in his old department, according to the lawsuit.

Although most of his suit has now been dismissed, Richard has appealed the summary judgment, saying his attorney, Bradford E. Henschel, was one day late in submitting some documents that would have supported his case. Henschel said he forgot Martin Luther King Jr.'s birthday was a holiday.

Meanwhile, Richard's months of sifting through federal documents has yielded at least one interesting discovery: Federal officials confirm that JPL failed to file required reports to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission from 1982 to 1989 that break out how many minorities and women are employed by the lab in each job category.

Alexander says JPL believes it filed the documents, but added that "we cannot verify that."

Richard also hopes that he will be vindicated by Department of Labor review of JPL's affirmative action programs. While compliance reviews are routine, federal officials say this one, which began in January, 1992, would have ended sooner if JPL had provided the materials that the government requested.

Alexander says the confusion arose because JPL does not keep track of its personnel according to the same categories as the Department of Labor.

After JPL's last compliance review, in 1984, the laboratory agreed to establish separate hiring goals for black and Latino workers in underrepresented categories such as science and engineering that would reflect the available labor pool in the Los Angeles metropolitan area. According to Alexander, JPL's minority employment in science, engineering, administration and management are at parity with the county.

But Richard points out that JPL officials use 1980 data supplied by the Department of Labor. JPL said it only received updated 1990 statistics from Labor last month.

But to Richard, such explanations are just one more reason why he must continue fighting JPL like a modern-day David pitted against a space-age Goliath.

"It's where I've been concentrating my energy and time," Richard says. "It's the only way I keep my sanity. This IS my job."

Copyright © 2019, Los Angeles Times
EDITION: California | U.S. & World
66°