Advertisement

Gap Divides Worlds of Menendezes, Their Jurors : Trial: The two panels are made up mostly of mainstream working people. Deliberations resume today.

Share
TIMES STAFF WRITER

For five months, as he showed off a nifty collection of string ties and cowboy hats, re-knotted his ponytail and thoughtfully stroked his bushy white beard, Juror No. 4 bore a remarkable resemblance to country singer Willie Nelson.

Then, just a few days after Lyle Menendez’s jury began deliberations, the Willie look-alike shaved his beard.

Grooming preference? Or a signal of some sort about the course of the deliberations?

With Lyle and Erik Menendez’s juries beginning a third week of deliberations today, every little thing the jurors do is being scrutinized for meaning, particularly as they ask to review snippets of evidence: one day, the tape of the brothers’ counseling session with their psychologist; another day, the testimony of the boat captain who took the Menendez family shark fishing the night before the sons shotgunned their parents.

Advertisement

Although it’s always a guessing game why jurors do what they do, one thing is clear from records in the Menendez case: The tennis-playing brothers from Beverly Hills are being judged by 24 men and women who have little in common with them.

The two groups of 12 deciding whether Erik and Lyle Menendez are guilty of murder in the Aug. 20, 1989, slayings of their parents are generally mainstream working people from the San Fernando Valley, most much closer in age to the dead parents than to the sons. A number of them know from personal experience what it is like to be a victim of crime--two had fathers shot to death.

In the questionnaires that they filled out in June as potential jurors, the panelists gave other glimpses into their lives.

One juror, who lives in the same Northridge house where she grew up, is proud of an 80-pound weight loss. Another, a Navy veteran, saw combat in Korea and Vietnam. Yet another reported that he holds an office at his Masonic Lodge: Worshipful Master.

A 51-year-old Portuguese American woman said she learned to speak English in one year. A Northridge man, who turned 46 during the trial, said he owns bolt-action rifles, pistols and shotguns for protection, sport and investment.

And a 50-year-old Tarzana woman let it be known that she is married to a county prosecutor. But she also regrets that she spanked her daughters, now in their 20s.

Advertisement

*

As at any trial, jurors bring differing life experiences into deliberations. In the Menendez case, the debate behind closed doors is surely intense--if it’s anything like the give-and-take at kitchen tables across the nation, where the trial has touched many people in a personal way because of the brothers’ tearful claims that they were the victims of childhood sexual abuse.

When the juries were being selected, prosecutors and defense attorneys were tight-lipped about what characteristics they were looking for. But the general consensus among trial-watchers was that, unlike other recent high-profile trials around Los Angeles, race was not a determining factor. In this case, it was gender.

V. Hale Starr, a Phoenix-based expert who has consulted lawyers on jury selection and trial tactics for 17 years, suggested that prosecutors may have wanted more men, believing they would give “a cold, hard reading of the facts” of the shootings.

Starr said that although it is dangerous to stereotype, men and women typically have been socialized to make decisions differently. Accordingly, she said, the defense likely wanted more women, believing that they might be more open to emotion.

But, as always, there were risks: Might not women--particularly mothers--identify with Kitty Menendez, who was shot 10 times by her sons, including a final blast to the face? Or might they identify with the chief defense attorneys, both women? Or with the lead prosecutor, also a woman?

As it turned out, the Lyle Menendez jury ended up with five men and seven women. Erik Menendez’s jury is split evenly, six men and six women.

Advertisement

Two juries are hearing the case because some evidence was admitted against only one brother.

“The fact that it’s been going on so long, we already know that it’s a very stressful, very high-tension situation,” Starr said. “There are strong feelings being expressed and real inner turmoil being shared.”

When they resume deliberations today, Lyle Menendez’s jury will enter a 10th day of deliberations, spread across three weeks. Erik Menendez’s jury will be in its seventh day.

Prosecutors contend that the brothers killed out of hatred and greed. Lyle Menendez, 25, and Erik Menendez, 23, say years of abuse led them to fear--and finally kill--their mother and father, millionaire entertainment executive Jose Menendez.

As she was explaining that position in closing arguments, Erik Menendez’s lead lawyer, Leslie Abramson, prodded jurors to open their minds to the unconventional defense.

“I can tell some of you are very resistant to what I’m saying,” Abramson said as two jurors, both men, sat with folded arms.

Advertisement

But then she made eye contact with three women who were seated together in the jury box, and added, “You must entertain the possibility I’m telling the truth.”

One of those women is 36, the youngest of eight children, single and from Tujunga. A records clerk at a phone company, she said on her questionnaire that she likes travel, camping and hiking.

Next to her in the front row is a 27-year-old woman from Burbank, a bookstore clerk. Asked for a religious preference, she said, “Monotheistic.”

Behind them, in the back row, is a 36-year-old woman from Lake View Terrace, an engineer at another phone company who likes gardening, genealogy and bird-watching.

For months, the three have spent time together at the courthouse. But they mix with others as well--the one in the back row left court last week chatting with a 65-year-old Topanga man, the one who saw combat in Korea and Vietnam as a chief petty officer in the Navy.

The Menendez jurors as a whole have shown little of the open animosity that characterizes deliberations in many long cases, such as the recently concluded Reginald O. Denny beating trial, in which jurors wrote competing notes to the judge and some finally demanded the ouster of a colleague.

Advertisement

Here, the Erik Menendez jury in particular has seemed steadfastly cheerful, sticking together outside the Van Nuys courthouse during breaks, often around a hot dog cart. At the end of last week, they joined in a breezy “Merry Christmas” to Superior Court Judge Stanley M. Weisberg before heading home.

Despite the extensive publicity, the jurors are not being sequestered--a precaution that can add to tensions as jurors itch to return to their own beds and home cooking.

These juries do not seem to be in a hurry to reach a decision. The Lyle Menendez panel has asked to go home early on at least a couple of days. The Erik Menendez jury patiently listened to a rereading of testimony almost all day Thursday.

The foreman of the Erik Menendez jury is a chemist and dean at Cal State Northridge. He also is one of several on that jury whose lives have been touched by crime. A grandfather was beaten to death in the 1960s, he reported.

The 36-year-old woman in the front row said a relative was sexually assaulted and the attacker sentenced to 35 years in prison. The 27-year-old from Burbank said her father was shot to death and the killer sentenced to life in prison.

A 53-year-old man in the back row, originally from Dayton, Ohio, said his father was shot to death in 1952.

Advertisement

On the Lyle Menendez jury, only one panelist reported that a family member had a brush with serious crime--the woman who lives in the same house in which she grew up. She said a grandmother was raped.

That does not mean that other jurors have been untouched by crime. They had the option of keeping from public view any family violence, substance abuse and sexual abuse--only the lawyers saw that portion of their questionnaires.

Most of the jurors are parents, nine on the Erik Menendez panel and seven of those judging Lyle Menendez.

Seven of Erik Menendez’s jurors are over 50.

The entire front row of the Lyle Menendez jury is over 40, and two are in their 60s. But in the back row, four jurors are 35 or younger, one of them 22.

The composition of the Lyle Menendez jury has changed several times during the trial, in part because the case has gone on so long. One woman, who was not even showing when jury selection began in June, had to leave to give birth a few weeks ago.

Weisberg has dismissed two other jurors without explanation. One was a Canoga Park man who said on his questionnaire that he was once in a fight with a biker and had the biker “down and was pumpin’ some sense into him” when other bikers arrived and jumped him.

Advertisement

The Erik Menendez jury has stayed the same from start to finish, although Weisberg dismissed one of the six alternates a few weeks back.

Of Erik Menendez’s jurors, four work for phone companies and two for the post office. There’s an electrician, a homemaker, the book clerk, the Navy vet and the college dean. One juror works for a spouse’s engineering firm.

*

The Lyle Menendez jury features no phone company employees--but one postal worker. A 35-year-old Van Nuys man, he was elected foreman.

Others on that panel include a UPS driver, a gas company benefits analyst, two part-time students, two retirees, a mechanic and a secretary.

And then there’s the one who looked like Willie Nelson. Before he began his lengthy stint on jury duty, he said, he was looking for work.

* RELATED STORY: F1

Advertisement