SPECIAL REPORT / ELECTION PREVIEW : DECISION ’94 / A Voter’s Guide to State and Local Elections : Propositions : PROP. 179
What it is: Thousands of people--mostly teen-agers and children--have been killed or wounded in recent years in drive-by shootings. Under this proposition, the minimum sentence for a second-degree murder conviction in a drive-by shooting would be increased from 15 years to 20. The maximum sentence would still be life imprisonment. Under the state Constitution, it takes passage of a voter initiative to make the change because the original second-degree sentencing law was enacted by a vote of the people.
*
Arguments for: Drive-by shootings have become so frequent, particularly in the Los Angeles area, that tougher action must be taken against those who kill and maim from a passing car. This measure will ensure that drive-by killers get long prison sentences even if prosecutors cannot obtain first-degree murder convictions.
*
Arguments against: Longer prison sentences mean more costs for the state and a greater likelihood of prison overcrowding.
*
Who supports it: Gov. Pete Wilson, state Sen. Ruben Ayala (D-Chino), Assemblyman Tom Umberg (D-Garden Grove), Atty. Gen. Dan Lungren and the California District Attorneys’ Assn., Police Chiefs’ Assn., Sheriffs’ Assn. and Peace Officers’ Assn.
*
Who opposes it: No one listed in ballot pamphlet.
Get the L.A. Times Politics newsletter
Deeply reported insights into legislation, politics and policy from Sacramento, Washington and beyond. In your inbox three times per week.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
