Advertisement

Luck Holds for the Dwellers of Crystal Cove

Share
TIMES STAFF WRITER

Ignoring an eviction notice has paid off once again for dwellers at Crystal Cove State Park, where state officials are granting a maximum two-year extension for residents who refused to budge from one of the most scenic spots in Orange County.

If this all sounds familiar, that’s because it is. Since 1979, the state has been trying to oust the more than 100 residents who lease funky cottages at the state-owned beach colony.

Each battle goes something like this: State sets a eviction date. Deadline comes and goes. No one leaves. State gives in, extends the deadline and vows it will be the last reprieve.

Advertisement

“Our intent is not to extend it again,” Ken Mitchell, a supervising architect overseeing the cove area for the state Department of Parks and Recreation, said Monday. “We’re looking at a month-to-month lease for a max of two years.”

Evictions have been ordered four times over the years as the state pursues plans to turn the 12.3-acre cove and its 45 cozy cottages into a tourist resort on the rugged coastline between Corona del Mar and Laguna Beach.

Most recently, residents were ordered out by Dec. 31, 1995, but both sides now say they’ve reached a “win-win” agreement that lets residents stay and nets the state as much as $500,000 in rent each year.

The pending agreement lets residents continue leasing their homes until renovations begin on individual cottages.

A two-year extension was set because the project may take several years to complete. Some residents may stay longer than others, depending on how soon work begins on their cottage, officials said.

Cove residents said Monday they are pleased, though hardly sounded surprised. But then, they never believed the state’s threats to evict them in the first place.

Advertisement

“We’ve been hoping and hoping,” said Jeanette Dillinger, who divides her stays at the cottage with two other couples. “We thought something like this would happen, so we’ve all just been hanging in there.”

It’s easy to understand why residents stubbornly refuse to leave the cove, an offbeat enclave that has attracted people since the 1920s, when it was still part of the sprawling Irvine Ranch that made up much of Orange County.

Most of the cottages were built by the folks who later lived in them and in some cases have remained in family hands for five generations. Weather-beaten and ramshackle, the funky, thrown-together style earned the cottages historical status by the National Register of Historic Places as the last intact example of “vernacular beach architecture.”

Nestled against the hillside, the cottages offer stunning views and overlook a pristine stretch of beach that residents pretty much have to themselves. Dolphins frequently frolic in the surf and on clear days Santa Catalina Island is visible in the distance.

Residents pride themselves on creating a close-knit community that shuns the hustle and bustle of the outside world. Indeed, one of the cove’s most well-known symbols is a sign hanging outside an artist’s studio that reads: “Please set your clocks back to 1930.”

“It’s a very special place,” said Dillinger, who has been visiting the cove since the early 1950s.

Advertisement

For many, the best part is the price. While some pay as much as $2,000 a month, others rent for as little as $400, depending on cottage size and condition. In all, the state collects roughly $500,000 a year in rent from cove residents, officials said.

The eviction cycle started back in 1979, when the state purchased the cove and nearly 1,900 surrounding acres. In 1982, cove residents brokered a deal allowing them to live there 10 years in exchange for giving up any claim to the cottages.

When that deadline rolled around, residents got a six-month extension. Then came a 2 1/2-year extension that expired New Years’ Eve. At the time, state Resources Secretary Douglas P. Wheeler said the date would stand, commenting that residents have had “an extraordinarily long period” to prepare for that moment.

But not a single person moved. Instead, residents sued, arguing that the state would be negligent to give up $500,000 in annual rent when work on the cottages may not begin until 1997. They also alleged the historic cottages would fall into disrepair if left vacant.

Residents haven’t paid rent since the six-month stalemate began. The new leases will demand back payment and it is believed that two cottages have been abandoned by individuals unwilling to come up with the lump sum, Mitchell said.

Several residents were reluctant to discuss the deal Monday, saying state officials have warned them against talking to the news media.

Advertisement

Privately, they say sooner or later they must leave their piece of paradise.

“Of course we’re trying to stay here as long as possible. If we can get it, we’ll take it,” said one resident who declined to be identified. “Wouldn’t you?”

(BEGIN TEXT OF INFOBOX / INFOGRAPHIC)

Still Staying

Deal allows residents to remain until renmovation begins.

Advertisement