Advertisement

An Incomplete Showcase for a Biting Wit

Share
WASHINGTON POST

Guy shambles out on stage, takes in the applause.

“How you doing, folks? You gotta bear with me. Uh, I’m very tired. Very tired of traveling.” He lights a cigarette. “And, uh, very tired of doing comedy. Very tired of staring out at your vacant faces looking back at me ...”

Some fidgeting in the audience.

” ... wanting me to fill your empty lives with humor you couldn’t possibly think of yourselves. Good evening.”

An explosion of laughter. That’s a howdy from Bill Hicks, the start of his set.

Uncomfortable truth as humor is what Hicks did so ingeniously, and what made him one of the best stand-up comics of his time and why most likely you never heard of him.

Advertisement

“Philosophy,” a new CD that Rykodisc calls the best of Hicks, isn’t. It’s funny and sporadically brilliant, but it isn’t his best. Hicks would have hated the mislabeling: He would have publicly trashed it as blatant marketing hype by a recording industry in the satanic thrall of the almighty dollar. Why not? Hicks never quailed at sabotaging his own career or at firebombing bridges in his wake. He had a terrific, ruthless bit about what a sellout Jay Leno was for hawking Doritos; that would be the same Leno who helped launch Hicks’ career.

We are in the past perfect here because Hicks is dead. He died of pancreatic cancer in 1994 at 32, a comic who might well have achieved the stardom he merited had he not based his best material on subjects so unnerving that he scared anyone with a paycheck to protect. Even David Letterman’s show, not known for its cowardice, censored him.

By stand-up standards, Hicks wasn’t particularly vulgar or profane. The Texas-raised comic was much more interesting than that. He nakedly praised pornography, but only the really good stuff. He thought cigarettes were swell, up to a point. (“If you are smoking out of a hole in your neck, you might want to consider quitting.”) He mocked organized religion. (“Why do Christians wear crosses around their necks? Do you think when Jesus comes back he ever wants to see a ... cross? It’s like going up to Jackie Onassis with a rifle pendant on.”)

He thought death was a hoot, advocating the use of terminally ill people as movie stuntmen. (“What, you think that’s cruel? You want your grandmother to die like a little bird in some hospital room, her skin so thin you can see her last heartbeat work its way down her blue veins?” A conspiratorial smile: “Or do you want her to meet Chuck Norris ? ‘Hey, he kicked her head right off her body! Wow! Did you see that? Did you see my grammy?”’)

That last bit isn’t on “Philosophy.” Neither is the Leno evisceration or Hicks’ savage take on police perjury in the Rodney King trial or his uncontained glee over the ironic jogging death of messianic fitness guru Jim Fixx. For these you must mine previous Rykodisc releases of his work: “Dangerous” (1990), “Relentless” (1992), “Arizona Bay” (1996) and “Rant in E Minor” (1997).

Hicks was nasty and judgmental; his lefty sanctimony could run on past humor and into tedium. But mostly his targets were deserving, and his aim was true. He decried what he saw as a creeping anti-intellectualism in America and the hypocrisy of the religious right and the insipidity of the mass media. He clearly enjoyed being an outlaw, but from time to time, he gave the audience a glimpse of a fella with a heart and soul. Complaining once that the network talking heads were too negative, he crafted a nightly news segment more to his liking:

“Today a young man on acid realized that all matter is merely energy condensed to a slow vibration, that we are all one consciousness experiencing itself subjectively, there is no such thing as death, life is only a dream, and we are the imagination of ourselves. Here’s Tom with the weather.”

Inevitably, Hicks is likened to Lenny Bruce, but other than that both died young and angry, the comparison fails. Without Bruce there would have been no Hicks; Bruce was an iconic figure, central in the struggle for free speech because his intellectual persecution came at the hands of the American government itself. Hicks’ censorship troubles were negligible by comparison but in a way equally insidious--they came from the custodians of his own craft. Both Bruce and Hicks were beclouded by drugs, but Bruce succumbed to addiction and Hicks escaped his.

Advertisement

Ultimately, the comparison fails because Hicks was a lot funnier than Bruce. Unlike Bruce, Hicks never forgot that however loaded the social commentary, his primary mission was to entertain.

Advertisement