Advertisement

Few to See Full Iraqi Report

Share
Times Staff Writers

As Iraq’s 12,000-page weapons declaration winged its way toward United Nations headquarters Sunday, the U.S. government scrambled to negotiate full access to it while trying to make sure that some other members of the Security Council received a censored version, U.S. and U.N. officials said.

By late Sunday, a compromise had been reached that would allow the five permanent members of the Security Council -- the United States, Britain, Russia, China and France, all of which have nuclear weapons -- to receive unedited copies of the declaration, Bush administration and Security Council officials said.

However, before handing Iraq’s report over to the 10 elected Security Council members, officials will expunge details that they fear might help other countries make their own nuclear, chemical or biological weapons and ballistic missiles, sources said.

Advertisement

An Iraqi official said Sunday that the declaration would show that his country has no weapons of mass destruction, and he demanded that the United States produce evidence to support its charges to the contrary. But the official appeared to imply that Iraq had at some point been close to building a nuclear bomb.

The diplomatic dance over who will be permitted to analyze Iraq’s documentation seemed to foreshadow struggles between the Bush administration and its uneasy partners on the Security Council.

Among the tensions cited by experts Sunday was whether the United States and Britain can share intelligence that could help inspectors find evidence to prove whether the documentation is false without fear that the information would leak and blow the cover of Iraqi informants or other intelligence sources. Then too, what will happen if the inspectors fail to produce evidence to support the Bush administration’s claim that Iraq is not in compliance with Security Council demands? And what if there is no Security Council consensus on whether Iraq is in “material breach” of the U.N. resolutions demanding that it disarm?

On Saturday, one day ahead of the U.N. deadline, Iraq handed over a dossier of 11,807 pages, 352 pages of supplements and a stack of computer disks. A U.N. official carried the material to the island of Cyprus, the base for the U.N. weapons inspectors, and then on to Vienna, headquarters of the International Atomic Energy Agency. An IAEA senior official, Jacques Baute, was waiting to pick up the 2,100 or so pages of material pertaining to Iraq’s nuclear program.

Baute was trailed by a phalanx of television cameras, which filmed the green suitcase as it was rolled through the Vienna airport. The footage was broadcast over and over Sunday while experts debated what the documents might contain.

The nuclear documents will be analyzed in Vienna, while the rest of Iraq’s declaration -- on the status of the country’s chemical, biological and missile programs -- will be scrutinized at U.N. headquarters in New York, where it arrived Sunday night.

Advertisement

But there was confusion about how the most sensitive disclosures, if any, were to be handled, and by whom.

A U.N. official said the head of the IAEA, Mohammed Baradei, had come under pressure from a number of Security Council members, including the United States, who wanted copies of the nuclear documents. But he resisted making them available because of concerns, raised by the agency even while the United Nations was debating the latest resolution, that details of Iraq’s nuclear weapons program could leak and serve as a primer for other nations seeking the atomic bomb, the official said.

“Of course he’s under pressure,” the official said. “Every day there’s been contact. The last we heard officially was that IAEA would sanitize the nuclear declaration, which would then go to the Security Council.

“We don’t know how it is going to come out,” the official added. “There is some confusion about how this decision gets made.”

In Washington, Secretary of State Colin L. Powell spent much of the weekend on the telephone, speaking Saturday with diplomats in Russia, France and Mexico and Sunday with the foreign minister of Mauritius about how the sensitive documents would be handled. Still, as of midday Sunday, a senior administration official said, “it’s not decided yet who will get it when and in what edition.”

Later Sunday, however, another Bush administration official and a Security Council diplomat said an arrangement had been reached to give the unexpurgated document only to the five permanent members. This satisfied the administration and the proliferation concerns raised by the chief U.N. weapons inspector, Hans Blix.

Advertisement

Still, it was unclear how it would be implemented without infuriating the 10 elected members of the council -- Colombia, Syria, Cameroon, Guinea, Singapore, Mexico, Norway, Bulgaria, Mauritius and Ireland. But because Colombia now holds the council’s presidency, it too presumably would receive a copy of the full report, the diplomat said.

In the past, former weapons inspector Jonathan Tucker said Sunday, a sensitive issue has been the identity of the suppliers of dual-use technologies, which can be employed for either commercial or military purposes. Companies around the world cooperated with UNSCOM, the former U.N. inspection team, on the condition that they not be identified publicly, he said; giving their names and describing their technologies could be “a road map to other countries interested in obtaining dual-use technology,” he said. The five permanent Security Council members, however, are presumed to already have access to such information.

The concerns about security are compounded by the belief that in the previous rounds of weapons inspections, which ended in 1998, Russia provided intelligence that helped Baghdad not only anticipate where the U.N. inspection teams would search but ensure that they found nothing. Moreover, during negotiations over the Security Council resolution this fall, a Russian diplomat was spotted handing a copy of a draft text of the resolution on Iraq, meant for council deliberations only, to an Iraqi diplomat.

“You certainly can’t guarantee that it won’t leak out,” the Security Council diplomat said. “The Iraqis could give it to [other countries], or someone from the IAEA or UNMOVIC [the current inspection teams] could leak it.”

But the diplomat also said the information in the declaration could prove unenlightening.

“We haven’t seen it yet,” the official said. “The whole thing could be a bit overblown.”

At a news conference in Baghdad on Sunday, Amar Saadi, who identified himself as a British-educated chemist and one of many advisors to Iraqi President Saddam Hussein, bristled at American descriptions of the declarations as “a telephone book” designed to bury the truth in paperwork.

He said the documentation was so massive because the U.N. resolution required Iraq to identify all dual-use technologies and facilities. That means Iraq had to list every factory and facility that could conceivably be used to make nuclear, chemical or biological weapons, even though they are not being used for such purposes, Saadi said.

Advertisement

“You will be surprised when you know that the Ministry of Interior is included because it operates water treatment plants and sewage treatment plants, and those plants require chlorine and other chemicals for treatment,” he said.

Other facilities -- such as canneries and breweries, which contain fermentation equipment; hospitals, which have laboratories; petrochemical, fertilizer and food-processing plants; and any others drawing more than 10 megawatts of electricity -- had to be included, he said.

However, Saadi appeared to confirm Western assessments that Iraq was close to making an atomic bomb in 1990.

“We have the complete documentations, from design to all the other things,” he said. “We haven’t reached the final assembly of a bomb nor tested it.... It’s for the IAEA to judge how close we were. If I tell you we were close, it is subject[ive], maybe promotional.”

Saadi said the declaration was “comprehensive and truthful” and demanded that the Bush administration immediately produce any evidence it has to the contrary.

But former weapons inspector Richard O. Spertzel told CNN’s “Late Edition” on Sunday that intelligence agencies have to be mindful of the evidence they disclose, noting that Iraq’s position has long been “Show us everything you have, and I’m sure we can explain it all away.”

Advertisement

U.S. and U.N. officials and former weapons inspectors said it could take weeks to analyze the contents of the declaration. The documents will be examined for inconsistencies and omissions and checked against a list of unresolved issues left by the U.N. inspection team that departed Iraq in 1998.

“It’s real forensic work,” said former chief inspector Richard Butler. “Inspectors will want to discern from the documents what Iraq has not said.”

Former American weapons inspectors and U.S. officials appeared to be trying to lower public expectations for the kind of evidence that might be considered sufficient to determine whether Iraq is cheating. Inspectors need not catch Iraq red-handed with possession of a banned weapon in order to demonstrate a pattern of deception or noncompliance, they stressed.

“The point of inspections is not to find the smoking gun. It might be just to find the smoke,” former inspector David Kay told CNN.

Meanwhile, 35 more U.N. inspectors and some helicopters arrived in Baghdad to bolster the inspection teams there.

*

Efron reported from Washington, Farley from New York and Rubin from Jerusalem. Sonya Yee of The Times’ Vienna Bureau contributed to this report.

Advertisement
Advertisement