Animal-care laws could solve many problems

Re “Riding the Underdog Railroad,” Column One, Aug. 24

*

As a dog person myself, I can sympathize with the extraordinary efforts undertaken by those involved in rescuing strays and finding them good homes. But I do believe that time, money and effort could be better spent advocating for stricter laws concerning animal care. State law should require that all dogs be spayed or neutered, absent an owner’s obtaining an expensive breeding license, and tagged with either an ID tattoo or a microchip. Such laws, as well as animal cruelty penalties, should be vigorously enforced.

This, more than any rescue efforts, would help to reduce the incidence of pet overpopulation and animal cruelty.

ALEXIS A. CAMERON

San Pedro

*

We thought at first it was interesting to read of such tremendous efforts to transport a dog (Paddy) to his new home miles away, but were heartsick to learn of his new home shared by many sick and crated animals. This article is upsetting. We think someone in California should have met with the new owner (“a well-known animal rescuer and environmentalist”) to evaluate Paddy’s new living conditions before his adoption. We are certain the Browders didn’t intend this end for him.

CAROL HARAGAN

KAROLE VELZY

Northridge