Bird Flu Pandemic May Be Less Likely

Share via
Times Staff Writer

An experiment combining bird flu with a common human strain failed to create a pandemic virus, suggesting that it may be more difficult for bird flu to mutate into a form that is easily transmissible among humans, federal scientists said Monday.

Researchers in a high-security lab infected ferrets with genetically engineered versions of H5N1 avian influenza and found that the animals did not infect other ferrets caged nearby. The hybrid flu versions also appeared less virulent than their parent strains.

Flu researchers and virologists expressed guarded optimism about the findings.

“The fact that a simple gene swap didn’t immediately create a monster virus is reassuring,” said Dr. Anna Moscona, an infectious disease specialist at Cornell University’s Weill Medical College who was not connected with the research.


Still, Dr. Julie L. Gerberding, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which led the research, sounded a cautious note about the study.

“These data do not mean that H5N1 cannot develop into a pandemic strain, it means that the genetics of that transformation are more complicated than a simple one-to-one exchange,” she said.

“Though we weren’t able to do this through some simple gene exchanges, there are many other combinations and subtle changes that the virus itself could make,” she said.

The H5N1 avian influenza has remained mostly a disease of birds, although it has occasionally infected humans. According to the World Health Organization, 232 people have been infected since 2003, of whom 134 died.

Health officials worry that the disease could mutate into a form that could spread much more efficiently among people, leading to a pandemic.

Previous studies have shown that flu epidemics in 1957 and 1968 were caused by exchanges of genes between avian and human influenza viruses. CDC researchers tried to mimic this process, said Taronna Maines, a CDC microbiologist and lead author of the study.


Because they began the work in 2002, the researchers picked the only H5N1 strain known to cause human infection at that time -- a 1997 strain from Hong Kong. They chose a human H3N2 flu strain because it is responsible for the most annual flu infections.

Out of 50 possible variations, the researchers created three hybrid strains.

“We tested the combinations that we thought had a good chance of being able to replicate well both in culture and in the ferrets,” said team leader Jackie Katz, a CDC microbiologist.

Ferrets were used in the experiment because they are similar to humans in the way the flu virus attacks their respiratory system.

Some of the ferrets initially infected with the hybrid viruses lost weight and carried the viruses in their nasal droplets, but the viruses were not passed along to other ferrets placed in adjacent cages.

The researchers then tried to pass the viruses from ferret to ferret by spraying uninfected animals with nasal secretions from infected ones.

This was performed sequentially with a number of ferrets, and the last one in the sequence failed to pass on the resulting virus to still other ferrets placed in a cage next to it.


“It’s sort of good news,” said James Stevens, a structural biologist at the Scripps Research Institute in La Jolla.

But he added that the good news was diluted because the test was conducted with a strain of bird flu that is now nearly 10 years old.

The virus has evolved since then, and the findings may not hold for strains that are circulating now.

“It would be nice to repeat the experiments with a more modern virus and see if there is that same effect,” he said.

CDC officials said they were planning to do more work with different versions of the avian and human influenza viruses.