Court of public opinion mixed on judge’s ouster

Re “Judge’s Loss Stuns Experts,” June 8

Although I no longer practice law or live in Los Angeles, the news of Judge Dzintra Janavs’ election defeat by a snack shop owner and nonpracticing lawyer left me in awe.

I appeared before Janavs several times, both in trial court and in Writs and Receivers Court, which requires a high degree of legal acumen.

In my opinion, she was one of the few remaining legal lights in L.A. Superior Court, and her loss is a tragedy for the legal system and the people of L.A.

DERMOT RYAN

Las Vegas

*

As I read about how outraged experts are about Janavs’ defeat by Lynn Diane Olson, I can’t help but think that this is democracy at its finest.

A seemingly safe incumbent upset by a challenger who wants it more and works harder -- this is what politics is all about. And despite what the Los Angeles County Bar Assn. says, it might not be a bad idea to have someone on the bench with some real-world experience.

For too long, judges have approached their position as a lifetime selection, with the formality of an almost automatic reelection every once in a while if they are so unlucky. If they want the job, let them work for it.

I submit that sitting judges aren’t as much appalled at the defeat of Janavs as by the prospect that they might not be so safe the next time their turn comes. The system works just fine.

BOBBY OWSINSKI

Burbank

*

“Olson and her husband, Michael Keegan, a Hermosa Beach councilman, said they did not target Janavs because of her name but rather because she was Republican.” That remark alone shows just how unqualified Olson is for the office. Judges hold nonpartisan offices. Olson should withdraw before she is sworn into office and let Janavs be appointed to fill the term.

P.J. EVANS

Chatsworth