Advertisement
Share

White House pledges to fix intelligence gaps

The Obama administration pledged Thursday to close gaps in the intelligence system that enabled a suspected terrorist carrying explosives to board a U.S.-bound plane, and vowed to create a better system for sharing and analyzing the information that floods the intelligence community.

The White House based its assertions on the early findings of two inquiries into what it calls the “human and systemic failures” that took place in the run-up to a Nigerian man’s alleged attempt to blow up a plane carrying nearly 300 people from Amsterdam to Detroit on Christmas.

The administration would not release the conclusions, but it said Obama will hold meetings next week in Washington aimed at getting the tangle of government agencies responsible for fighting terrorism to more diligently assess and share information.

Meanwhile, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano announced that she would send senior department officials to meet with leaders from major international airports in Africa, Asia, Europe, the Middle East and South America to review security procedures and technology being used to screen passengers on U.S.-bound flights.

Advertisement

Senior administration and intelligence officials said the inquiries’ preliminary findings show that in some cases, systemic problems, including a lack of interagency coordination, prevented key pieces of information from being shared or matched up.

But in other cases, intelligence analysts simply didn’t connect the disparate pieces of information already in their computer databases that could have flagged Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab and stopped him from boarding Northwest Airlines Flight 253, according to officials familiar with the preliminary investigation.

The need for the White House review underscores one of the more troubling aspects of the Christmas incident: Despite spending billions to shore up the nation’s defenses and intelligence networks after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, the U.S. still struggles to digest and act upon all of its anti-terrorism intelligence.

“It points to something fundamental,” said Richard A. Clarke, a former top counter-terrorism official in the Bush and Clinton administrations. “No matter how good your software is or how good your procedures are, at the end of the day it comes back to people. And if people think that this is a 9-5 job and they’re not filled with a sense of urgency every day, then you’ll get these kinds of mistakes.”

Advertisement

Briefing reporters in Hawaii, a senior administration official said the various intelligence breakdowns identified so far are being addressed.

The official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said, “When we do have information and when we have good information -- as we often do, given how good our intelligence professionals are -- the failure to share that information is not going to be tolerated.”

According to intelligence and administration officials, the lack of communication and intelligence-sharing is especially apparent in the Abdulmutallab case.

Starting in August, the National Security Agency intercepted some communications between senior members of Al Qaeda’s regional network in Yemen in which they discussed possible attacks involving an unidentified Nigerian.

Advertisement

But those intercepts were vague, did not refer to potential attacks on U.S. soil, and were not highlighted as an urgent cause for concern for the nation’s analysts at the CIA, the National Counterterrorism Center or elsewhere in the U.S. intelligence community, according to officials familiar with the communications.

Then, in November, Abdulmutallab’s father told officials at the U.S. Embassy in Abuja, Nigeria, that his 23-year-old son had fallen in with a group of extremists and might have traveled to Yemen.

Much of that information was sent back to Washington in a classified cable, and although officials at CIA headquarters in Langley, Va., prepared a formal report on the father’s information, it wasn’t shared with the larger intelligence community until after the jet incident, an intelligence official familiar with the document said.

Administration officials have said that the information in that report could have placed Abdulmutallab on federal lists that would have subjected him to additional screenings or barred him from flying.

Advertisement

But other officials said the CIA did send the raw data from the father’s visit to classified computer networks that are available to all analysts at the National Counterterrorism Center, the agency set up after Sept. 11 as a clearinghouse for intelligence.

Some U.S. officials said the raw data would not have flagged the suspect because the information was too vague.

“Abdulmutallab’s father didn’t say his son was a terrorist, let alone planning an attack,” another U.S. intelligence official said. “I’m not aware of [any] intelligence that suddenly would have flagged this guy -- whose name nobody even had until November -- as a killer en route to America.”

Others challenged that assertion, saying that if the CIA had disseminated its formal report, it would have drawn far more attention than raw, unhighlighted data and could have prompted analysts to link the intercepts of the Al Qaeda leaders in Yemen with the information provided by Abdulmutallab’s father.

Advertisement

If they had linked the two pieces of information, authorities might have flagged Abdulmutallab as a serious threat.

Instead, his name was added to a general threat database of 550,000 names that is not cross-checked with other databases. And Abdulmutallab was allowed to board Flight 253.

An intelligence official from a different agency defended the NCTC, dismissing criticism that an analyst should have matched up the intercepts about an unspecified Nigerian with the raw intelligence from the CIA.

“The bull’s-eye seems to have settled on them,” he said, adding such an assessment was unfair.

Advertisement

The NCTC, he said, “routinely gets terabytes of data, in quantities that boggle the mind. The question is, what format was it in? Was it query-able? Could you look for it and find it? Was it shareable? Was it in a database that could be accessed by everyone?”

josh.meyer@latimes.com

peter.nicholas@latimes.com

alana.semuels@latimes.com

Advertisement


Advertisement