Republican-led House panel votes to gut Dodd-Frank financial law
House Republicans took a major step toward their long-promised goal of unwinding the stricter financial rules created after the 2008 crisis, pushing forward sweeping legislation that would undo much of President Obama’s landmark banking law.
A House panel on Thursday approved Republican-written legislation that would gut much of the Dodd-Frank law enacted by Democrats and signed by Obama in the wake of the financial crisis and the Great Recession. The party-line vote in the Republican-led House Financial Services Committee was 34-26.
“I can’t do a good James Brown, but I feel good,” said Rep. Jeb Hensarling, the normally reserved Republican chairman of the committee. Hensarling, of Texas, wrote much of the overhaul legislation.
Republicans argue that the law passed under Obama is slowing economic growth because of the cost of compliance and by curbing lending.
Democrats said the GOP bill would create the same conditions that led to the financial crisis and pushed the economy to the brink of collapse.
Rep. Maxine Waters of Los Angeles, the panel’s senior Democrat, called it “a deeply misguided measure that would bring harm to consumers, investors and our whole economy.”
“The bill is rotten to the core and incredibly divisive,” said Waters.
In a fast-moving session following two days of laborious debate, the panel flew through a series of votes on amendments, as the majority Republicans easily beat back Democrats’ attempts to reshape and soften the legislation.
The bill would repeal about 40 provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act. Banks that meet a strict basic requirement for building capital to cover unexpected big losses could qualify for much of the regulatory relief in the bill.
Republicans argued that big banks have done well under Dodd-Frank, but that community banks and credit unions are struggling to keep up with the regulatory burdens imposed by the law.
“This economy is poised to take off, but it’s not going to take off as long as Dodd-Frank in its current form remains on the books,” Hensarling said.
Such agreement was nonexistent during the House hearings this week. Instead, the hearings turned into a contentious debate over Democratic efforts to cast a spotlight on Trump’s business empire and his refusal to release his tax returns.
The Republican bill also goes after an agency that enforces consumer protection laws and scrutinizes the practices of virtually any business selling financial products and services, including credit card companies, mortgage servicers and auto lenders.
The bill would remove some of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s powers and replace its guaranteed funding from the Federal Reserve with whatever Congress determines would be the appropriate amount, a move Democrats said would gut the agency.
The Consumers Union advocacy group criticized the legislation, saying the CFPB has worked to win almost $12 billion in refunds and relief for an estimated 29 million Americans.
“This bill strips the CFPB of most of its power and would leave consumers vulnerable to fraud, hidden fees and costly gotchas by banks and unscrupulous financial firms,” said Pamela Banks, senior policy counsel for Consumers Union.
Your guide to our clean energy future
Get our Boiling Point newsletter for the latest on the power sector, water wars and more — and what they mean for California.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.