Uber defies DMV’s order to cease self-driving car program in San Francisco
Uber said it will continue to operate its self-driving cars in San Francisco despite demands from the California Department of Motor Vehicles to cease its program or face legal action.
In a call with reporters Friday, Anthony Levandowski, Uber’s vice president for self-driving technology, argued that the ride-hailing giant’s newest cars shouldn’t be regulated like autonomous vehicles because they still require human drivers in case of emergency.
In essence, Uber’s new fleet of taxis should be treated the same as Tesla, Levandowski said.
“It’s hard to understand why the DMV would seek to require self-driving Ubers to get permits when it accepts that Tesla’s Autopilot technology does not need them,” he said.
The DMV did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
But in a tersely worded letter addressed to Levandowski on Friday, the attorney from the California Department of Justice ordered Uber to remove its self-driving cars from the state’s roadways until it complies with state rules.
“If Uber cannot advise the undersigned that it will immediately remove its self-driving vehicles from California public roadways until it obtains the appropriate permit, as 20 other companies have done, the Attorney General will seek injunctive and other appropriate relief,” the letter said.
It is not unusual for Uber to launch a new program without consulting regulators.
A self-driving truck rolled out in Nevada also caught the ire of the DMV there after a promotional video surfaced showing one of the vehicles rolling down a highway without a driver behind the wheel.
“Real-world testing on public roads is essential both to gain public trust and improve the technology over time,” Levandowski said.
John M Simpson, privacy project director with Consumer Watchdog, was angered by Uber’s decision to flout the DMV’s demand.
“It’s an outrageously irresponsible position,” Simpson said. “The DMV should immediately seek an injunction and Uber’s executives should be prosecuted to the fullest extent possible under the law.”
Follow me @dhpierson on Twitter
5:15 p.m.: This article was updated to include a response from the California Department of Justice.
Your guide to our clean energy future
Get our Boiling Point newsletter for the latest on the power sector, water wars and more — and what they mean for California.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.