U.S. annual trade deficit shrinks for the first time in six years
The U.S. trade deficit narrowed in 2019 from the widest in a decade, reflecting plunges in shipments from China and oil imports while giving President Trump some evidence that he has delivered on pledges to reduce the gap.
The annual deficit in goods and services decreased for the first time in six years, narrowing 1.7% to $616.8 billion, according to Commerce Department data released Wednesday. The December gap rose from the prior month to $48.9 billion, wider than the median estimate of economists, as oil imports from Canada jumped.
Trump frequently cites the deficit as evidence of the failure of his predecessors’ trade policies — even though most economists don’t dwell on the indicator — but the gap remains more than 20% wider than before he became president. That widening reflects steady gains in American consumer spending, which drives imports.
The annual merchandise-trade deficit with China — the principal target of Trump’s trade war — narrowed 17.6% to $345.6 billion after hitting a record in 2018. Imports from China slumped 16.2%, exceeding the drop in 2009 during the global financial crisis, while shipments to China declined 11.3%, the biggest drop since at least 2003.
Whatever the economic loss may be from the coronavirus, the hit to the world will be harder than what was felt from SARS because China’s role in the global economy is greater.
That pushed China down to third place among America’s top trading partners for goods in 2019. Mexico jumped to the top spot, slightly ahead of Canada. The merchandise deficits with Mexico and the European Union climbed to record highs, while the U.S. surplus in services fell 4% to $249.2 billion as imports grew.
Even with the trade tensions, oil was a chief force behind the narrowing of the full-year deficit. Petroleum imports dropped $31.4 billion to $193.9 billion while exports increased, narrowing the full-year gap in such products to a record-low $13.7 billion. On a monthly basis, the U.S. has been a net exporter since September.
The non-petroleum goods deficit was $839.2 billion, a record high.
“Everything the president has done has shown that the advice of more traditional economists has actually been very solid — so we don’t see the trade deficit closing as a result,” said Mary Lovely, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics and economics professor at Syracuse University.
Last month, the U.S. and China signed the first phase of a trade agreement that’s supposed to see the Asian nation buying an additional $200 billion worth of American goods over the next 24 months. The deal is a culmination of almost three years of acrimonious talks that have roiled markets.
Many thought that $200-billion target was lofty even before the coronavirus outbreak threatened to hit the global economy. Officials in Beijing hope Washington will agree to some flexibility on pledges in their deal, people familiar with the matter said this month.
On Jan. 29, Trump signed a new trade pact with Canada and Mexico into law, extending the life of the trading bloc created by the North American Free Trade Agreement in the 1990s with some significant updates. The White House is now turning its attention to scrutinizing trade links with other nations and regions including the U.K., Africa and the European Union. U.S.-EU relations started to sour in 2018 when the Trump administration invoked national-security considerations to impose tariffs on steel and aluminum from Europe.
Trump said Tuesday in his State of the Union address that his tariff strategy with China has worked. The agreement with China will protect U.S. workers and intellectual property, open markets and “bring billions and billions of dollars into our Treasury,” he said.
Under the tariffs, U.S. companies importing goods from China are paying the levies that flow to the Treasury. That forces firms to decide how to take a hit to profits, shift supply chains or pass along price increases to customers.
As a share of the economy, the overall trade gap narrowed to 2.9% of gross domestic product, down from 3% in 2018. It’s still significantly smaller than in the decade before the last recession, when it approached 6%.
For the full year, exports fell 0.1% to $2.5 trillion as shipments of civilian aircraft declined amid the grounding of Boeing Co.’s 737 Max plane, while sales of autos, consumer goods and petroleum gained. Imports fell 0.4% to $3.12 trillion on lower purchases of crude oil, computer accessories and telecommunications equipment.
The view from Sacramento
For reporting and exclusive analysis from bureau chief John Myers, get our California Politics newsletter.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.