Black former franchisees sue McDonald’s for alleged discrimination
More than 50 Black former McDonald’s franchise owners are suing the burger chain, alleging that the company steered them to less-profitable restaurants and didn’t give them the same support and opportunities given to white franchisees.
The 52 plaintiffs, who owned about 200 U.S. restaurants before being forced to sell them over the last decade, are seeking compensation of $4 million to $5 million per store, according to the lawsuit. The suit was filed Tuesday in federal court in Chicago, where McDonald’s is based.
The lawsuit accuses McDonald’s of steering Black franchisees to stores in inner-city neighborhoods with lower sales volumes and higher security and insurance costs. The company would provide them with misleading financial information or push them to decide quickly when a store became available, the lawsuit says.
Once Black franchisees owned a store, they would be asked to rebuild or remodel within a shorter period of time than white franchisees, without the rent relief and other financial support given to white franchisees, the lawsuit says. Black franchise owners were also denied the chance to buy more-profitable stores in better neighborhoods, it says.
As a result, the plaintiffs averaged sales of $2 million a year. By comparison, the average sales for U.S. McDonald’s franchises was $2.7 million annually between 2011 and 2016 and $2.9 million in 2019, the lawsuit says.
“Revenue is determined by one thing and one thing only: location,” said James Ferraro, the Miami-based attorney representing the plaintiffs. “It’s a Big Mac. They’re the same everywhere.”
McDonald’s sues ex-CEO Steve Easterbrook over alleged sexual relationships with staff members
The fast-food giant has filed suit against former CEO Steve Easterbrook, whom it accuses of concealing sexual relationships with three employees.
Ferraro also noted that the number of Black franchisees had fallen by half over the last two decades. The chain had 377 Black franchisees in 1998; it has 186 now. At the same time, the number of franchise restaurants has more than doubled to 36,000.
McDonald’s denied the allegations and defended its history with Black franchisees.
“These allegations fly in the face of everything we stand for as an organization and as a partner to communities and small business owners around the world,” the company said. “Not only do we categorically deny the allegations that these franchisees were unable to succeed because of any form of discrimination by McDonald’s, we are confident that the facts will show how committed we are to the diversity and equal opportunity of the McDonald’s system, including across our franchisees, suppliers and employees.”
McDonald’s has a troubled history with Black franchisees. In 1969, activists boycotted four McDonald’s locations in Cleveland until the company sold them to Black owners. In 1983, a Black franchise owner from Los Angeles sued the company for discrimination; McDonald’s eventually paid him $4.5 million.
Editorial: Time’s up for McDonald’s and others to protect low-wage workers from sexual harassment
Over the last two years, the world has heard much about sexual harassment in the entertainment industry.
In 1996, McDonald’s leadership acknowledged that Black franchisees weren’t achieving parity with their white counterparts and resolved to make changes. Don Thompson, the company’s first Black president and chief executive, served from 2012 to 2015.
But allegations of discrimination continued. In January, two Black McDonald’s executives sued the company. They claimed McDonald’s shifted advertising away from Black customers, graded Black-owned stores more harshly than white ones and implemented business plans that had a discriminatory effect on Black franchisees.
At the time, McDonald’s said it disagreed with the characterization of its actions. It noted that 45% of its corporate officers and all of its field vice presidents are people of color.
The view from Sacramento
Sign up for the California Politics newsletter to get exclusive analysis from our reporters.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.