Advertisement

Jury returns $63-million verdict against Chevron over toxic pit near Santa Barbara

Chevron gas station in Oakland
A jury has found that Chevron covered up a toxic chemical pit in Santa Barbara and then sold the land to a man who built a house on it and fell ill.
(Ben Margot / Associated Press)
Share via

A California jury has returned a $63-million verdict against Chevron after finding that the oil giant covered up a toxic chemical pit on land purchased by a man who built a house on it and was later diagnosed with a blood cancer.

Kevin Wright, who has multiple myeloma, unknowingly built his home directly over the chemical pit near Santa Barbara in 1985, according to his lawsuit.

Starting in 1974, Chevron subsidiary Union Oil Co. of California had operated a sump pit for oil and gas production, a process that left the carcinogenic chemical benzene on the property, court papers said.

Advertisement

Wright bought the land and built the house in 1985. Nearly three decades later, he was diagnosed with a cancer that attacks plasma cells in the blood and that can be caused by benzene exposure, court documents said.

The Los Angeles County refinery was ranked as the top emitter of nitrogen and selenium among 81 oil facilities in 2021, a recent study found.

Jan. 26, 2023

The jurors in Santa Barbara on Wednesday returned the $63-million verdict, said Jakob Norman, an attorney for Wright. Norman called the case a “blatant example of environmental pollution and corporate malfeasance.”

Chevron said Union Oil Co. would appeal the judgment.

“We strongly disagree with the jury’s decisions to award compensatory and punitive damages,” Chevron said in a statement Thursday.

Advertisement

Wright’s cancer is in remission, his attorneys said, but he regularly undergoes chemotherapy treatments to hold the illness at bay.

“They cut corners, and my life was turned upside down as a result,” Wright said in a statement provided by his attorneys. “Chevron’s continued denial of the harm they caused is a shameful reminder that this company values only profits, not people.”

Advertisement