Advertisement

Great Coaching

Share
Latimes.com Columnist

Coaching seems to be the decisive variable in the development of a successful football team, although, in New Orleans as well as in Philadelphia on Sunday, that might not be apparent.

One game doesn’t make a career.

The odds are that Jim Haslett of the New Orleans Saints andAndy Reid of the Philadelphia Eagles are two of the fastest rising coaches in the game--college or pro--yet that’s hard to prove every time out.

This time particularly.

In the NFL’s two games of the week:

• The Denver Broncos, who are also superbly coached, will beat New Orleans, which Haslett has led to the top of the NFC West.

Advertisement

• The Tennessee Titans, who are first in the AFC Central,will be at Philadelphia, which Reid has led to first in the NFC East.

* * * *

The Better Coach Wins

More than any other American pastime, football, I’d say, isa game of coaching.

Across any reasonable period of time, good coaches win, theothers don’t.

Thus, the upward surge of a good new leader is one of themore exciting realities of life in the NFL.

And Haslett and Reid seem to be surging.

Haslett, the rookie conqueror of the St. Louis Rams Sunday,is 7-1 in his last eight games after turning around one of the most determined losing franchises in the 81 years of the NFL, a New Orleans team that went 16-40 under its last two coaches.

Reid, who is 8-2 in his last 10 after after a last-placefinish as a 1999 rookie, can become one of the few in NFL history to rise in one seasonfrom worst to first.

* * * *

Good Coaching: Good Passing

The great coaches always choose, or develop, greatquarterbacks.

It was in the 1960s, for example, that Green Bay Coach VinceLombardi promoted an obscure, low-round draft choice: eventual Hall of Famer BartStarr.

Twenty years later, San Francisco Coach Bill Walshdiscovered not one but two young winners: third-round draft choice Joe Montana, aneventual Hall of Famer, and NFL castoff Steve Young, a probable Hall of Famer.

Advertisement

That isn’t to say that New Orleans’ new quarterback, AaronBrooks, and Philadelphia’s, Donovan McNabb, are Hall of Fame-bound.

But in Sunday’s upsets, they played at that level.

McNabb, one of the NFL’s many rookie-or-virtual-rookiequarterbacks this year, ran and passed Reid’s Eagles to a 23-20 victory over theWashington Redskins.

Brooks, an extraordinary young talent making his second NFLappearance and first start, ran, passed and thought Haslett’s team to a 31-24 victory overthe Rams, who were also led by a backup quarterback, Trent Green.

Brooks outplayed Green.

* * * *

Defense Hurts Rams’ Offense

When quarterback Kurt Warner returns from injury to replaceGreen Sunday at Carolina, he will have, altogether, three games to get set for theRam-Saint rematch in the Superdome Christmas Eve.

Two of the three will be as tough as they come: MinnesotaDec. 10 and Tampa Bay Dec. 18, a Monday night.

Nothing, however, could be much tougher than St. Louis atNew Orleans in the regular-season finale if the NFC West is then on the line.

Advertisement

The Saints have been a non-winning nonentity since the daythey were born, 33 years ago.

If, now, they are suddenly to have a champion’s chance witha bright new coach--who inherited most of the players who could hardly win for losing lastyear--the insane roar of a Superdome crowd is not what Warner would prefer to hear on whathas always been, for him, the quiet night before Christmas.

His basic problem is that the Rams don’t have much defensivetalent.

Should they fall out of the race now, after winning it allin 1999, it will be obvious that they blew 2000 in the offseason when their front officerefused to spend for defensive improvements.

Warner’s greatness obscured the defensive weaknesses of theRams last year and early this season.

No more.

His opponents, now, will just be waiting around for him toscore fast so they can score, too.

* * * *

Haslett’s Saints Get Physical

One defining thing about the Saints is the aggressive,physical way they play offensive, defensive and special-team football under unknown newcoach Haslett.

He sees the game as first of all a test of manhood.

In this, Haslett has aligned himself with the greatoffensive philosophers of all time--with, particularly, George Halas of the bad oldChicago Bears, who popularized the intellectual T formation; with tough-guy Lombardi, whocould for eight hours lecture amusingly--four hours before lunch and four after--on oneoffensive play, the Green Bay sweep, and most of all with Walsh, whose 49er players werewidely acclaimed as West Coast finesse players.

Advertisement

Walsh loved that label because it disguised their truenature as members of an overtly physical, aggressive powerplant.

Haslett seems to be as wise as any other forward-lookingfootball intellectual today, calling, among other things, first-down passes and first-quarter onside kickoffs as well as beautifully timed blitzes.

Still, the decisive ingredient in the Saints’ success so farhas been their unremitting physical dominance.

There is a great gulf even so between Haslett and the modernNeaderthal types who also coach a rough game.

The difference is that the Saints’ aggressiveness merelyunderpins their intelligent approach to offense.

Although Haslett football isn’t as wide open as that of theRams, it’s smarter and smoother than the Neanderthal game that most of his victimsplay.

Advertisement

* * * *

Play-Action Hurts Manning

The season’s case example of a group playing apparentlyunwise offensive football--after drafting obviously gifted offensive players--is theIndianapolis Colts, who are 7-5 today with what should be about a 10-2 team.

Like most conservative coaches, Indianapolis’ Jim Mora seesthe forward pass as a frail instrument to be resorted to only after ground plays havesoftened up the enemy.

Hence, each week, Indianapolis passer Peyton Manning findshimself confined in a play-action straightjacket.

Typically, he first gives the ball to halfback EdgerrinJames to establish the Colts’ running-play offense.

Next, before throwing it, Manning typically fakes a handoffor pitch to James.

In other words, the Colts this year are passing off fakeruns.

A more modern coach would tell Mora that they’d be moreeffective if they’d run off fake passes.

In that case, on any first down, for example, Manning wouldusually be passing into defenses stacked against James.

Advertisement

And on second and eight--or third and five--James would berunning into pass defenses waiting for Manning to throw.

By doing things backward, the Colts lost to Miami the otherday, 17-14.

Numerically, James can expect that whatever he gains Sundayagainst New York Jet ground defenses would be doubled if, instead, he were running mostlydraw plays into Jet pass defenses.

And if Manning were passing against defensive players whoseminds were on running back James, his pass yardage would, no doubt, more than double.

* * * *

Billick Coaching Makes Dilfer

The season’s case example of the difference coaching makesin NFL football is the Baltimore Ravens, who promoted quarterback Trent Dilfer to theirstarting team four games ago, and who, after winning all four, are 9-4 going into theiropen date Sunday.

What’s more, in the loss column, the Ravens are but one gameback of 9-3 Tennessee now that Dilfer has won again--44-7 over Cleveland--the team theycould only beat with four field goals in October, 12-0, when they went five weeks withoutscoring a touchdown.

This is Dilfer’s first season under Brian Billick, theBaltimore coach, but if you didn’t know that--if you hadn’t seen him stumbling around atquarterback for six years at Tampa Bay--you might rate him up there with the great passersof the 1990s.

Advertisement

In 1994-99, as Dilfer’s critics expanded their nationalmembership from year to year, he was on only two winning Tampa teams in sixseasons.

Successively, he was then in the charge of two Tampacoaches, Sam Wyche, whose personnel was otherwise inadequate, and Tony Dungy, the greathead coach who is still there and who still lacks an offensive clue.

All those years in Florida, what most critics alwaysmisunderstood while talking down Dilfer is the nature of quarterbacking.

It’s a two-man profession.

Quarterback Otto Graham and Coach Paul Brown made thatevident long ago, as did Starr and Lombardi later, not to mention Montana and Walsh stilllater.

In almost every instance, to win, the nominal NFLquarterback needs a dedicated offensive thinker backing him up on the bench.

Dilfer has that now with Billick, who, just by understandingthe many, many details of quarterbacking--and conveying that to Dilfer--has made him awinner.

Advertisement

* * * *

Another Buc Critic: Bucs’ Sapp

Coaching is so much the key to football success that foryears, I’ve been critical of the Buccaneers for playing old-fashioned run-first footballdespite the kind of offensive talent that, with modern pass-first play-calling, couldmake them a champion.

As I’ve insisted, the Buccaneers have just what it takes tojoin the party: good passing, with Shaun King now; good receiving with Keyshawn Johnson,Jacquez Green and others, and good ballcarrying with Mike Alstott, who is temporarilyinjured, and particularly with Warrick Dunn.

And on the Tampa team this year, as you may have heard, Ihave an ally.

He is the best Buccaneer player, defensive lineman WarrenSapp, who stood up at a team meeting last week and, singling out offensive coach LesSteckel, knocked him by name--knocking Steckel’s offensive system and play-calling.

It takes some courage for a football player to publiclycriticize his coach, but the Tampa problem is clearly Steckel or head coach Tony Dungy orboth.

Although Dungy is the NFL’s foremost defensive coach and anasset as a head coach, that, in pro football, is not now enough.

Sapp knows.

* * * *

Three Plus Four: Seven

So, believe it, football is a game of coaching.

At Denver, for example, the Broncos, with all theirinjuries, would be dead today if they had been led last year and this by--instead of MikeShanahan--any of 25 or 30 other current NFL head coaches.

Advertisement

It is Shanahan’s leadership and nothing else that has Denverat 8-4 this week after the loss of quarterback Brian Griese and running back Terrell Davisand so many other talented Broncos.

It is Dennis Green’s leadership that has Minnesota at10-2.

And at Oakland, Jon Gruden’s leadership has lifted theRaiders to 10-2.

The NFL surprise is that four other head coaches have joinedthe top bunch in just this one season: Billick, Haslett, Reid and the Rams’ offensivephilosopher, Mike Martz, who is doing it with offense alone on a team whose front officegives him less help than anyone else in pro football’s top seven or eight.

You can bet that Gruden, for example, gets the support heneeds at Oakland from Al Davis, who won three Super Bowls without him.

Their relationship now, you can bet, is one of mutual needand assistance.

Long-range winning demands that kind of relationship.

The other major surprise this year is that when the Saintsbrought in Haslett a few months ago, they reportedly gave him only a one-yearcontract.

Before the dawn of 2001, that’s going to cost them--orsomebody--a bundle.

Advertisement