Fire engulfs a building under construction in the 900 block of North Fremont Avenue in downtown Los Angeles.(KTLA)
The Los Angeles city attorney has filed a $20-million lawsuit against the developer of the downtown Da Vinci Apartments project, claiming its negligence was responsible for the damage caused by a massive 2014 fire at the project construction site.
The Dec. 8 fire destroyed the 75,000-square foot, seven-story complex alongside the 110 Freeway.
The blaze forced the closure of the freeway and the intense heat cracked at least 160 windows at the headquarters of the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power.
The lawsuit, filed Thursday, claims the project developer, Geffrey H. Palmer, and his company, GH Palmer Associates, failed to have an appropriate fire protection plan. The suit claims the developer failed to compartmentalize construction, install fire walls or doors on the property or have an appropriate water supply to fight a fire. It also failed to provide security to prevent a person from going on the property and burning it down, the lawsuit claims.
According to the suit, when the project caught fire and flames engulfed the wood framing, it “generated a giant blaze, large plumes of smoke, a rain of ash and soot, and melting heat.”
Nearby city properties suffered an estimated $80 million in damage from the fire and the water used to extinguish it, officials claim. The city’s insurance policy only covered $61.9 million of the damage, the suit claims.
The city is asking to be reimbursed by the developer for the rest of the money.
GH Palmer Associates was not immediately available for comment.
From its inception, the 526-unit Da Vinci project was controversial.
Its Italianate architecture, experts said, stood in awkward contrast to the surrounding buildings. The company also designed the Orsini on North Figueroa Street and the Visconti on West 3rd Street, both near the intersections of the 110 and 101 freeways.
The Da Vinci project called for a pedestrian bridge to neighboring complexes that, depending on one’s interpretation, insulated its residents from the homeless on the street or provided convenient access to downtown attractions.
After a debate, the bridge was ultimately approved by the L.A. City Council.
For breaking California news, follow @JosephSerna.