L.A. teacher sues union, saying dues were illegally taken out of her paycheck

LOS ANGELES, CA - JANUARY 22, 2019 United Teachers Los Angeles President Alex Caputo-Pearl, center,
United Teachers Los Angeles President Alex Caputo-Pearl is flanked by L.A. Mayor Eric Garcetti, left, and LAUSD Supt. Austin Beutner while speaking about a resolution to the teachers’ strike Tuesday.
(Al Seib / Los Angeles Times)

A Los Angeles Unified teacher filed a federal class-action lawsuit this week against United Teachers Los Angeles alleging the group continued to take dues out of her paycheck despite a change in law that bars public-sector unions from forcing members to pay.

Irene Seager, who teaches at Porter Ranch Community School, signed a card that authorized the deduction of union dues from her paycheck in April, which was a requirement of her employment at the time. Two months later, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that teachers, police officers and other public employees in several states, including California, could not be forced to pay dues or fees to support their unions.

The decision in Janus vs. AFSCME was a sharp defeat for public employee unions, as it overturned a 41-year-old precedent that allowed unions to negotiate contracts requiring all employees to pay a so-called fair share fee to cover the cost of collective bargaining.

After the ruling, Seager notified UTLA that she was resigning as a member and no longer consented to any deductions from her wages. The union denied her request, saying she was past the 30-day period to revoke her consent.


The Los Angeles Unified School District is also named in the lawsuit. The district and UTLA did not immediately respond to requests for comment Wednesday. News of the lawsuit comes as Los Angeles teachers returned to classrooms Wednesday following a strike that lasted six school days over contract issues.

Seager is asking the court as part of the lawsuit to strike down the union’s time-period provision, order officials to stop deducting dues from her wages and require them to refund money that was already taken.

“Ms. Seager’s case shows that union bosses are willing to trample on the First Amendment rights of the teachers they claim to represent to keep their forced-dues power,” Mark Mix, president of the National Right to Work Foundation — which is representing Seager — said in a prepared statement. “Despite what union bosses say, workers’ constitutional rights cannot be limited to just 30 days out of the year.”

Attorneys with the anti-union National Right to Work Foundation also funded the challenge against the law in the Janus vs. AFSCME case before the Supreme Court. The group is representing a math professor in Ventura County who is challenging the American Federation of Teachers over a similar time-period provision.


Twitter: @Hannahnfry

The stories shaping California

Get up to speed with our Essential California newsletter, sent six days a week.

You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.