The Supreme Court turned away another challenge to state laws banning the sale of rapid-fire assault weapons on Monday, a victory for gun control supporters at a time of heightened public concern over the issue.
Without comment or a dissent, the justices dismissed appeals from gun-rights advocates in Connecticut and New York who contended the state bans violated their rights under the 2nd Amendment.
The court's action came as no surprise. In December, the justices had turned down a similar appeal in a case from Highland Park, Ill., but over the dissents of Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas.
The high court's refusal to even consider the claim that the 2nd Amendment includes the right to own a rapid-fire weapon strongly suggest the majority of justices see the Constitution's protection of gun rights as more limited than many gun-rights advocates maintain.
In 2008 and 2010, the justices struck down ordinances in Washington, D.C., and Chicago that banned the private possession of handguns at home.
But the court has declined several opportunities to extend its ruling to protect other rights asserted by gun owners. The court has repeatedly refused to hear appeals from gun-rights advocates who claimed a constitutional right to carry a weapon in public or to buy rapid-fire weapons.
The U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals in New York upheld the state laws in Connecticut and New York, and the justices said Monday in Shew vs. Malloy that they would not review that decision.