Advertisement
World & Nation

This contractor says he can build Trump’s border wall faster and cheaper than the U.S. can

Tommy Fisher
Tommy Fisher, president and CEO of Tempe, Ariz.-based Fisher Industries, surveyed border fencing Tuesday that he’s building on private land in south Texas.
(Molly Hennessy-Fiske/Los Angeles Times)

President Trump took office vowing to build “a big, beautiful wall” along the 1,954-mile U.S.-Mexico border, but so far the federal government has managed to build only about one mile of new border wall.

Texas may be the biggest obstacle. Unlike in other states, most of the United States borderland in Texas is privately owned, which has delayed construction by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Federal lawyers have had to comb property records, track down landowners, make offers to buy the land and — if owners refuse to sell — file lawsuits to seize the land.

Tommy Fisher, a contractor with a Trump-like knack for dealmaking, says he can do much better.

His company has built around 1,500 feet of what it says will be a three-mile fence. The cost, he estimates, will be $42 million, faster and cheaper than government contractors who have spent months surveying and building more expensive border fences nearby. The estimated time of completion: two weeks.

Advertisement

Fisher, 50, said he hopes to sell or lease his section of the fence to the federal government, and to persuade them to contract with him to build more. Already, he has bought a hundred miles of land elsewhere along the river in Texas from about two dozen private owners. He has also attracted fierce criticism — and a federal audit.

“We’ll protect southern Texas faster than they ever dreamed,” he said Tuesday, as he helped workers pour concrete and place 18-foot steel bollards along the banks of the Rio Grande, a few miles west of the border city of McAllen. So far, they’ve built about 1,500 feet.

Fisher — who took over the family company from his father when he was 25 after graduating from Arizona State University with a degree in agribusiness — has moved swiftly to acquire land, overcoming local opposition.

Advertisement

Last year, federal prosecutors and the nonprofit National Butterfly Center sued to stop Fisher’s fence. They argued the wall was too close to the Rio Grande and risked changing its flow, altering the border and forcing floodwaters into Mexico in violation of international treaties — all of which Fisher disputed. Last week, a federal judge ruled in Fisher’s favor, lifting a temporary restraining order and allowing construction to resume.

Fisher’s neighbors are incensed.

Rey Anzaldua’s family has owned land next to where Fisher is building his fence for generations. Now he fears they could lose it to erosion.

“By them clearing the brush from the riverbank, they have speeded up the erosion process and the next flood, we’re going to lose some land,” said Anzaldua, 75, a retired customs agent. “What damage will it do to our property and properties downriver — or properties on the Mexican side?”

Scott Nicol, co-chair of the Sierra Club Borderlands Campaign, argued that Fisher’s private fence could worsen erosion and flooding.

“He shouldn’t be able to do it,” Nicol said. “One big concern is that the land the wall sits on is going to erode and get swept away. You can have terrible destruction just from their construction materials hitting things.”

Another detractor is Terence Garrett, a professor of political science at the University of Texas Rio Grande Valley in Brownsville.

“It’s more symbolic than effective,” said Garrett. “It may be cheaper, but I’m not sure he’s using the quality of materials you would normally see. It’s not going to be as strong and it certainly isn’t well thought in terms of placement.”

Advertisement

Typically, Garrett said, walls are built away from the actual border and run a straight line because it’s prohibitively expensive to follow the dramatic curves of the Rio Grande. In following more of a straight line close to the river, Fisher’s wall could cause massive flooding and danger to property, animals and the environment whenever hurricanes or tropical depressions feed massive amounts of water from tributaries into the river.

The idea of a private contractor building a wall, Garrett said, has shocked many neighbors.

“Normally, you have some kind of process to evaluate what actually might be commendable to the area, what might be reasonable. There is surveying by the government, coming in with the Army Corps of Engineers, and in the process some kind of condemnation. You might be against the idea of the government taking your land and using eminent domain, but at least there’s some kind of process. Here there’s no process. There’s no sort of realistic assessment as to how it might impact the area. That’s the issue that the landowners and neighbors have.

“Anything you do along the Rio Grande affects your neighbor because the river shifts. It can move at any time. Whatever you might do, it’s going to affect your neighbor -- including those on the other side of the river in Mexico.”

Fisher began preparing to build border fencing as soon as Trump got elected. He visited the Arizona border, talked to Border Patrol agents and ranchers.

“I wanted to build the biggest infrastructure known to man, and I said I think we can make it better than what agents have,” Fisher said. “If you want to get the border protected, we’ve got a solution right here in Texas put up faster and better.”

Indeed, the Washington Post reported this week, Trump is preparing to divert an additional $7.2 billion in Pentagon funding for border wall construction this year, enough to complete about 885 miles of new border barrier by spring 2022. That would bring the total federal funds allocated to border fencing to $18.4 billion.

“The first priority of the Department of Defense is protection of the homeland,” Defense Secretary Mark Esper said Tuesday. “If that’s what it takes, we are prepared to support it.”

Advertisement

An eight-mile section of border fence being built by a federal contractor near Mission cost $167 million — about $21 million per mile, $7 million more per mile than Fisher’s fence, which also includes a concrete access road. Fisher said that if the government contracted with him to build on the hundred acres of private land he owns along the river in Texas, he could fence it all within a year for about $1.4 billion, and would maintain it for a decade for an additional $400 million.

In an interview, Carmen Qualia, an assistant chief patrol agent at U.S. Customs and Border Protection, who is overseeing border wall construction in the area, said the other fence might have been more expensive than Fisher’s because it includes a concrete levee.

She said a five-mile stretch of border fence being built by federal contractors to the west in Starr County cost $14 million per mile.

Both fences are due to be completed within a year, she said, among nine border-wall building projects underway in the Rio Grande Valley.

Already, Qualia said the pace of border wall construction, “is picking up” and “we haven’t had any unusual delays.” She said the agency was not consulted about Fisher’s wall but was not concerned.

When Trump was elected, Fisher had hoped to offer a bid to construct the entire border wall. He went on a blitz of right-wing media, making his case to Trump via television and Twitter.

With 1,600 employees, his family’s North Dakota-based company, Fisher Sand & Gravel, had handled large western highway projects, including for CalTrans, but nothing for Homeland Security. The first time they were allowed to bid on the border wall last year, Fisher won a single $400-million federal contract to build 31 miles of fence in Yuma, Ariz. Surveying is underway, he said, but the company faces a federal audit after complaints from members of Congress that Trump steered the work their way.

Fisher insists he did nothing wrong and that the audit will show “how much we saved taxpayers.”

The Pentagon audit was ongoing this week, according to Pentagon spokeswoman Dwrena Allen, and the Army Corps was cooperating, according to Raini Brunson, a spokeswoman for the corps.

Last year, Fisher was hired by conservative Florida-based nonprofit We Build The Wall — whose board includes former Trump adviser Stephen K. Bannon — to build a half mile of border fence for about $23 million in 10 days in Sunland Park, N.M., despite opposition from local officials.

The group claimed on social media to have raised $25 million to hire Fisher as its contractor for the walls in New Mexico and Texas. Fisher said the nonprofit contributed only $1.5 million of the $42 million for the Texas fence and isn’t involved in his other ventures.

He erected one of the wall prototypes in California and lobbied lawmakers and Homeland Security, spending $75,000 in 2018 and $27,500 last year, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. After he helped elect North Dakota Sen. Kevin Cramer, Fisher attended Trump’s State of the Union address as his guest, shaking the president’s hand.

Fisher welcomes the comparisons to Trump: a businessman educated on construction sites. After his crews cleared brush from the riverbank to build his fence, Fisher had them plant palm trees and Bermuda grass. He says he wanted the area to look like a golf course to please Border Patrol agents working the area and of course, Trump.

“I’ve done everything that I can as a citizen,” he said. “The government can see it can be done. Now it’s time for them to say we’re going to protect this country.”

Staff writer Jenny Jarvie in Atlanta contributed to this report.


Newsletter
Get our Today's Headlines newsletter

A digest of essential news, insight and analysis from L.A. Times editors.

You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.
Advertisement